daniel/factbase-ancient-history
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update continuous-improve.sh: remove vikunja rebuild, fix domain language for ancient history

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
daniel
2026-02-22 22:06:32 +00:00
parent 23098547f1
commit 1c8a67349f
70 changed files with 3788 additions and 4926 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

109
legal-codes/code-of-ur-nammu.md
View File

@@ -31,68 +31,47 @@ The Code of Ur-Nammu (~2100–2050 BCE) is the oldest known legal code, predatin
## Review Queue
<!-- factbase:review -->
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Date: ~2100–2050 BCE" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Issuer: Ur-Nammu or Shulgi, Third Dynasty of Ur" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Language: Sumerian" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 13: "Discovered: Fragments found at Nippur and Ur" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 16: "Prologue establishes the king as agent of divine justice" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "~30 surviving laws (originally more)" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Covers: Bodily injury, robbery, sexual offenses, marriage, slavery, agricultu..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Uses monetary compensation (fines) rather than *lex talionis* ("eye for an ey..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 22: "Oldest known legal code, predating Hammurabi by ~300 years" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "Shows that Sumerian legal tradition favored fines over physical punishment" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: "Demonstrates sophisticated legal thinking in the 3rd millennium BCE [^2]" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Date: ~2100–2050 BCE" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Issuer: Ur-Nammu or Shulgi, Third Dynasty of Ur" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 12: "Language: Sumerian" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 13: "Discovered: Fragments found at Nippur and Ur" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 16: "Prologue establishes the king as agent of divine justice" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 17: "~30 surviving laws (originally more)" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 18: "Covers: Bodily injury, robbery, sexual offenses, marriage, slavery, agricultu..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 22: "Oldest known legal code, predating Hammurabi by ~300 years" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "Shows that Sumerian legal tradition favored fines over physical punishment" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 19: "Uses monetary compensation (fines) rather than *lex talionis* ("eye for an ey..." - Roth source from 1997 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 24: "Demonstrates sophisticated legal thinking in the 3rd millennium BCE [^2]" - Kramer source from 1954 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Date: ~2100–2050 BCE" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Issuer: Ur-Nammu or Shulgi, Third Dynasty of Ur" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Language: Sumerian" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 13: "Discovered: Fragments found at Nippur and Ur" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 16: "Prologue establishes the king as agent of divine justice" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "~30 surviving laws (originally more)" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Covers: Bodily injury, robbery, sexual offenses, marriage, slavery, agricultu..." - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Uses monetary compensation (fines) rather than *lex talionis* ("eye for an ey..." - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 22: "Oldest known legal code, predating Hammurabi by ~300 years" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "Shows that Sumerian legal tradition favored fines over physical punishment" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: "Demonstrates sophisticated legal thinking in the 3rd millennium BCE [^2]" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Date: ~2100–2050 BCE" - what is the source?
> Roth (1997) [^1], Kramer (1954) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Issuer: Ur-Nammu or Shulgi, Third Dynasty of Ur" - what is the source?
> Roth (1997) [^1], Kramer (1954) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 12: "Language: Sumerian" - what is the source?
> Roth (1997) [^1], Kramer (1954) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 13: "Discovered: Fragments found at Nippur and Ur" - what is the source?
> Roth (1997) [^1], Kramer (1954) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 16: "Prologue establishes the king as agent of divine justice" - what is the source?
> Roth (1997) [^1], Kramer (1954) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 17: "~30 surviving laws (originally more)" - what is the source?
> Roth (1997) [^1], Kramer (1954) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 18: "Covers: Bodily injury, robbery, sexual offenses, marriage, slavery, agricultu..." - what is the source?
> Roth (1997) [^1], Kramer (1954) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 22: "Oldest known legal code, predating Hammurabi by ~300 years" - what is the source?
> Roth (1997) [^1], Kramer (1954) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "Shows that Sumerian legal tradition favored fines over physical punishment" - what is the source?
> Roth (1997) [^1], Kramer (1954) [^2]
- [x] `@q[stale]` Line 19: "Uses monetary compensation (fines) rather than *lex talionis* ("eye for an ey..." - Roth source from 1997 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
> Scholarship remains current. Roth's work on ancient law codes is still authoritative.
- [x] `@q[stale]` Line 24: "Demonstrates sophisticated legal thinking in the 3rd millennium BCE [^2]" - Kramer source from 1954 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
> Scholarship remains current. Kramer's foundational work on Sumerian law is still cited.