daniel/factbase-ancient-history
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update continuous-improve.sh: remove vikunja rebuild, fix domain language for ancient history

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
daniel
2026-02-22 22:06:32 +00:00
parent 23098547f1
commit 1c8a67349f
70 changed files with 3788 additions and 4926 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

129
legal-codes/twelve-tables.md
View File

@@ -33,80 +33,55 @@ The Twelve Tables (~451–450 BCE) were the foundation of Roman law, the first w
## Review Queue
<!-- factbase:review -->
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Date: ~451–450 BCE" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Issuer: Decemviri (commission of ten men)" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Language: Archaic Latin" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 13: "Context: Conflict of the Orders between patricians and plebeians" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 16: "Originally inscribed on twelve bronze tablets displayed in the Roman Forum" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "Covered: Court procedure, debt, family law, property, inheritance, torts, pub..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Established legal equality (in principle) between patricians and plebeians" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Prohibited intermarriage between classes (later repealed by *Lex Canuleia*, 4..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 22: "Foundation of all subsequent Roman law (*ius civile*)" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "First written Roman law, ending patrician monopoly on legal interpretation" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: "Roman schoolchildren memorized them for centuries" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 25: "Original tablets lost (possibly in the Gallic sack of Rome, 390 BCE) [^2]" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 26: "Survived through quotations in later Roman legal and literary sources" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Date: ~451–450 BCE" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Issuer: Decemviri (commission of ten men)" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 12: "Language: Archaic Latin" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 13: "Context: Conflict of the Orders between patricians and plebeians" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 16: "Originally inscribed on twelve bronze tablets displayed in the Roman Forum" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 18: "Established legal equality (in principle) between patricians and plebeians" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 19: "Prohibited intermarriage between classes (later repealed by *Lex Canuleia*, 4..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 22: "Foundation of all subsequent Roman law (*ius civile*)" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "First written Roman law, ending patrician monopoly on legal interpretation" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 24: "Roman schoolchildren memorized them for centuries" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 26: "Survived through quotations in later Roman legal and literary sources" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 17: "Covered: Court procedure, debt, family law, property, inheritance, torts, pub..." - Crawford source from 1996 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 25: "Original tablets lost (possibly in the Gallic sack of Rome, 390 BCE) [^2]" - Watson source from 1975 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Date: ~451–450 BCE" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Issuer: Decemviri (commission of ten men)" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Language: Archaic Latin" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 13: "Context: Conflict of the Orders between patricians and plebeians" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 16: "Originally inscribed on twelve bronze tablets displayed in the Roman Forum" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "Covered: Court procedure, debt, family law, property, inheritance, torts, pub..." - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Established legal equality (in principle) between patricians and plebeians" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Prohibited intermarriage between classes (later repealed by *Lex Canuleia*, 4..." - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 22: "Foundation of all subsequent Roman law (*ius civile*)" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "First written Roman law, ending patrician monopoly on legal interpretation" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: "Roman schoolchildren memorized them for centuries" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 25: "Original tablets lost (possibly in the Gallic sack of Rome, 390 BCE) [^2]" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 26: "Survived through quotations in later Roman legal and literary sources" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Date: ~451–450 BCE" - what is the source?
> Crawford (1996) [^1], Watson (1975) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Issuer: Decemviri (commission of ten men)" - what is the source?
> Crawford (1996) [^1], Watson (1975) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 12: "Language: Archaic Latin" - what is the source?
> Crawford (1996) [^1], Watson (1975) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 13: "Context: Conflict of the Orders between patricians and plebeians" - what is the source?
> Crawford (1996) [^1], Watson (1975) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 16: "Originally inscribed on twelve bronze tablets displayed in the Roman Forum" - what is the source?
> Crawford (1996) [^1], Watson (1975) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 18: "Established legal equality (in principle) between patricians and plebeians" - what is the source?
> Crawford (1996) [^1], Watson (1975) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 19: "Prohibited intermarriage between classes (later repealed by *Lex Canuleia*, 4..." - what is the source?
> Crawford (1996) [^1], Watson (1975) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 22: "Foundation of all subsequent Roman law (*ius civile*)" - what is the source?
> Crawford (1996) [^1], Watson (1975) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "First written Roman law, ending patrician monopoly on legal interpretation" - what is the source?
> Crawford (1996) [^1], Watson (1975) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 24: "Roman schoolchildren memorized them for centuries" - what is the source?
> Crawford (1996) [^1], Watson (1975) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 26: "Survived through quotations in later Roman legal and literary sources" - what is the source?
> Crawford (1996) [^1], Watson (1975) [^2]
- [x] `@q[stale]` Line 17: "Covered: Court procedure, debt, family law, property, inheritance, torts, pub..." - Crawford source from 1996 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
> Scholarship remains current. Crawford's work on early Roman law is still authoritative.
- [x] `@q[stale]` Line 25: "Original tablets lost (possibly in the Gallic sack of Rome, 390 BCE) [^2]" - Watson source from 1975 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
> Scholarship remains current. Watson's work on Roman legal history is still foundational.