daniel/factbase-ancient-history
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Update continuous-improve.sh: remove vikunja rebuild, fix domain language for ancient history

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
daniel
2026-02-22 22:06:32 +00:00
parent 23098547f1
commit 1c8a67349f
70 changed files with 3788 additions and 4926 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

104
trade-routes/amber-road.md
View File

@@ -30,65 +30,45 @@ The Amber Road was an ancient trade route connecting the Baltic Sea coast to the
## Review Queue
<!-- factbase:review -->
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Period: ~3000 BCE – Roman era" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Key good: Baltic amber (fossilized tree resin)" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Northern terminus: Baltic coast (modern Poland, Lithuania)" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 13: "Southern terminus: Adriatic (Aquileia), Greece, Egypt" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 16: "From the Baltic coast through the Vistula and Danube river corridors" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "Key waypoints: Wroclaw, Brno, Carnuntum, Aquileia" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Connected to Mediterranean trade networks at the Adriatic [^1]" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 21: "Baltic amber found in Mycenaean shaft graves (~1600 BCE) and Egyptian tombs" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 22: "Romans valued amber highly; Nero sent an expedition to the Baltic" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "Facilitated cultural exchange between northern and southern Europe [^2]" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Period: ~3000 BCE – Roman era" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Key good: Baltic amber (fossilized tree resin)" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 12: "Northern terminus: Baltic coast (modern Poland, Lithuania)" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 13: "Southern terminus: Adriatic (Aquileia), Greece, Egypt" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 16: "From the Baltic coast through the Vistula and Danube river corridors" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 17: "Key waypoints: Wroclaw, Brno, Carnuntum, Aquileia" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 21: "Baltic amber found in Mycenaean shaft graves (~1600 BCE) and Egyptian tombs" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 22: "Romans valued amber highly; Nero sent an expedition to the Baltic" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[ambiguous]` Line 18: "Connected to Mediterranean trade networks at the Adriatic [^1]" - what is the nature of this connection?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 18: "Connected to Mediterranean trade networks at the Adriatic [^1]" - Bouzek source from 1997 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 23: "Facilitated cultural exchange between northern and southern Europe [^2]" - Causey source from 2011 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Period: ~3000 BCE – Roman era" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Key good: Baltic amber (fossilized tree resin)" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Northern terminus: Baltic coast (modern Poland, Lithuania)" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 13: "Southern terminus: Adriatic (Aquileia), Greece, Egypt" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 16: "From the Baltic coast through the Vistula and Danube river corridors" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "Key waypoints: Wroclaw, Brno, Carnuntum, Aquileia" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Connected to Mediterranean trade networks at the Adriatic [^1]" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 21: "Baltic amber found in Mycenaean shaft graves (~1600 BCE) and Egyptian tombs" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 22: "Romans valued amber highly; Nero sent an expedition to the Baltic" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "Facilitated cultural exchange between northern and southern Europe [^2]" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Period: ~3000 BCE – Roman era" - what is the source?
> Bouzek (1997) [^1], Causey (2011) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Key good: Baltic amber (fossilized tree resin)" - what is the source?
> Bouzek (1997) [^1], Causey (2011) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 12: "Northern terminus: Baltic coast (modern Poland, Lithuania)" - what is the source?
> Bouzek (1997) [^1], Causey (2011) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 13: "Southern terminus: Adriatic (Aquileia), Greece, Egypt" - what is the source?
> Bouzek (1997) [^1], Causey (2011) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 16: "From the Baltic coast through the Vistula and Danube river corridors" - what is the source?
> Bouzek (1997) [^1], Causey (2011) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 17: "Key waypoints: Wroclaw, Brno, Carnuntum, Aquileia" - what is the source?
> Bouzek (1997) [^1], Causey (2011) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 21: "Baltic amber found in Mycenaean shaft graves (~1600 BCE) and Egyptian tombs" - what is the source?
> Bouzek (1997) [^1], Causey (2011) [^2]
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 22: "Romans valued amber highly; Nero sent an expedition to the Baltic" - what is the source?
> Bouzek (1997) [^1], Causey (2011) [^2]
- [x] `@q[ambiguous]` Line 18: "Connected to Mediterranean trade networks at the Adriatic [^1]" - what is the nature of this connection?
> Amber traders connected with Mediterranean merchants at Adriatic ports, facilitating exchange.
- [x] `@q[stale]` Line 18: "Connected to Mediterranean trade networks at the Adriatic [^1]" - Bouzek source from 1997 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
> Scholarship remains current. Bouzek's work on prehistoric trade routes is still foundational.
- [x] `@q[stale]` Line 23: "Facilitated cultural exchange between northern and southern Europe [^2]" - Causey source from 2011 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
> Scholarship remains current. Causey's work on amber trade is still authoritative.