initial repo seedings
This commit is contained in:
98
legal-codes/code-of-ur-nammu.md
Normal file
98
legal-codes/code-of-ur-nammu.md
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
|
||||
<!-- factbase:5a1717 -->
|
||||
# Code of Ur-Nammu
|
||||
|
||||
# Code of Ur-Nammu
|
||||
|
||||
## Overview
|
||||
The Code of Ur-Nammu (~2100–2050 BCE) is the oldest known legal code, predating the Code of Hammurabi by ~300 years. It was issued by Ur-Nammu (or his son Shulgi) of the Third Dynasty of Ur.
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Facts
|
||||
- Date: ~2100–2050 BCE
|
||||
- Issuer: Ur-Nammu or Shulgi, Third Dynasty of Ur
|
||||
- Language: Sumerian
|
||||
- Discovered: Fragments found at Nippur and Ur
|
||||
|
||||
## Content
|
||||
- Prologue establishes the king as agent of divine justice
|
||||
- ~30 surviving laws (originally more)
|
||||
- Covers: Bodily injury, robbery, sexual offenses, marriage, slavery, agricultural disputes
|
||||
- Uses monetary compensation (fines) rather than *lex talionis* ("eye for an eye") [^1]
|
||||
|
||||
## Significance
|
||||
- Oldest known legal code, predating Hammurabi by ~300 years
|
||||
- Shows that Sumerian legal tradition favored fines over physical punishment
|
||||
- Demonstrates sophisticated legal thinking in the 3rd millennium BCE [^2]
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
[^1]: Roth, M.T. *Law Collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor* (1997)
|
||||
[^2]: Kramer, S.N. "Ur-Nammu Law Code" *Orientalia* 23 (1954)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Queue
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- factbase:review -->
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Date: ~2100–2050 BCE" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Issuer: Ur-Nammu or Shulgi, Third Dynasty of Ur" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Language: Sumerian" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 13: "Discovered: Fragments found at Nippur and Ur" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 16: "Prologue establishes the king as agent of divine justice" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "~30 surviving laws (originally more)" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Covers: Bodily injury, robbery, sexual offenses, marriage, slavery, agricultu..." - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Uses monetary compensation (fines) rather than *lex talionis* ("eye for an ey..." - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 22: "Oldest known legal code, predating Hammurabi by ~300 years" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "Shows that Sumerian legal tradition favored fines over physical punishment" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: "Demonstrates sophisticated legal thinking in the 3rd millennium BCE [^2]" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Date: ~2100–2050 BCE" - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Issuer: Ur-Nammu or Shulgi, Third Dynasty of Ur" - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 12: "Language: Sumerian" - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 13: "Discovered: Fragments found at Nippur and Ur" - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 16: "Prologue establishes the king as agent of divine justice" - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 17: "~30 surviving laws (originally more)" - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 18: "Covers: Bodily injury, robbery, sexual offenses, marriage, slavery, agricultu..." - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 22: "Oldest known legal code, predating Hammurabi by ~300 years" - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "Shows that Sumerian legal tradition favored fines over physical punishment" - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 19: "Uses monetary compensation (fines) rather than *lex talionis* ("eye for an ey..." - Roth source from 1997 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 24: "Demonstrates sophisticated legal thinking in the 3rd millennium BCE [^2]" - Kramer source from 1954 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user