daniel/factbase-ancient-history
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix deep scan: log output even on failure, capture exit code for debugging

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
daniel
2026-02-23 12:30:19 +00:00
parent 34d444aa17
commit 517c8f2cd0
71 changed files with 6824 additions and 333 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

203
battles/battle-of-actium.md
View File

@@ -84,4 +84,205 @@ The battle was the culmination of over a decade of rivalry between Octavian and
- [x] `@q[ambiguous]` Line 12: "Belligerents: Octavian vs. Mark Antony and Cleopatra VII" - what does "VII" mean in this context?
> VII is the regnal number — Cleopatra VII Philopator was the seventh queen of that name in the Ptolemaic dynasty. She is the famous Cleopatra (69-30 BCE). The numeral distinguishes her from earlier Cleopatras. No change needed — standard historical convention.
- [x] `@q[stale]` Line 25: "Octavian became sole ruler; Senate granted him the title Augustus (27 BCE) [^2]" - Lange source from 2022 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
> The fact that Octavian became Augustus in 27 BCE is one of the most well-established dates in Roman history. Lange's 2022 source is a recent scholarly work and remains current. No update needed.
> The fact that Octavian became Augustus in 27 BCE is one of the most well-established dates in Roman history. Lange's 2022 source is a recent scholarly work and remains current. No update needed.
---
## Review Queue
<!-- factbase:review -->
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 9: "Location: Ionian Sea, near Actium (western Greece)" - when was this true?
> True at the time of the Battle of Actium, 2 September 31 BCE. The battle was fought in the Ionian Sea near the promontory of Actium in western Greece. @t[=31 BCE]
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Belligerents: Octavian vs. Mark Antony and Cleopatra VII" - when was this true?
> True at the time of the Battle of Actium, 2 September 31 BCE. @t[=31 BCE]
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Commanders: Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa (for Octavian), Antony and Cleopatra" - when was this true?
> True at the time of the Battle of Actium, 2 September 31 BCE. @t[=31 BCE]
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Result: Decisive victory for Octavian [^1]" - when was this true?
> True at the time of the Battle of Actium, 2 September 31 BCE. @t[=31 BCE]
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Octavian's forces: ~400 ships (light Liburnian vessels) + 80,000 infantry, 12..." - when was this true?
> True at the time of the Battle of Actium, 2 September 31 BCE. @t[=31 BCE]
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Agrippa seized Methone and Leucas in early 31 BCE, cutting off Antony's Egypt..." - when was this true?
> True in early 31 BCE, during the campaign leading up to the battle. @t[=31 BCE]
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 20: "Antony's forces were weakened by desertion and disease during a prolonged blo..." - when was this true?
> True during the blockade and battle period, 31 BCE. @t[=31 BCE]
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 21: "Agrippa's Liburnians used the *harpax* — an iron-encased grappling harpoon ..." - when was this true?
> True during the Battle of Actium, 2 September 31 BCE. @t[=31 BCE]
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 22: "Cleopatra's squadron broke through and fled with the war chests; Antony follo..." - when was this true?
> True during the Battle of Actium, 2 September 31 BCE. @t[=31 BCE]
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "Remaining fleet surrendered the next morning; Antony's legions defected to Oc..." - when was this true?
> True on 3 September 31 BCE, the morning after the battle. @t[=31 BCE]
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 28: "Octavian ordered the execution of Caesarion (son of Julius Caesar and Cleopat..." - when was this true?
> True in 30 BCE, after Octavian's conquest of Egypt following Actium. @t[=30 BCE]
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 29: "Cleopatra's three children by Antony were taken to Rome and later raised by O..." - when was this true?
> True in 30 BCE, after Octavian's conquest of Egypt. @t[=30 BCE]
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 40: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Date: 2 September 31 BCE" - when was this true?" - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section (a previously answered question), not about a historical fact. The checker should not generate questions about the review queue section of documents. Filing as a bug.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 42: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Location: Ionian Sea, near Actium (western Greec..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 44: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Belligerents: Octavian vs. Mark Antony and Cleop..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 46: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 13: "Commanders: Agrippa (for Octavian), Antony and C..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 48: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 14: "Result: Decisive victory for Octavian [^1]" - wh..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 50: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "Octavian's fleet: ~400 ships; Antony's fleet: ~2..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 52: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Antony's forces were weakened by desertion and d..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 54: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Cleopatra's squadron broke through and fled; Ant..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 56: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 20: "Remaining fleet surrendered; Antony's legions de..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 58: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "Antony and Cleopatra committed suicide in Alexan..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 60: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: "Egypt became a Roman province" - when was this t..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 62: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 25: "Octavian became sole ruler; Senate granted him t..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 64: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Date: 2 September 31 BCE" - what is the source?" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 66: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Location: Ionian Sea, near Actium (western Greece..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 68: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 12: "Belligerents: Octavian vs. Mark Antony and Cleopa..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 70: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 13: "Commanders: Agrippa (for Octavian), Antony and Cl..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 72: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 17: "Octavian's fleet: ~400 ships; Antony's fleet: ~23..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 74: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 18: "Antony's forces were weakened by desertion and di..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 76: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 19: "Cleopatra's squadron broke through and fled; Anto..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 78: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 20: "Remaining fleet surrendered; Antony's legions def..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 80: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "Antony and Cleopatra committed suicide in Alexand..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 82: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 24: "Egypt became a Roman province" - what is the source?" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 84: "[x] `@q[ambiguous]` Line 12: "Belligerents: Octavian vs. Mark Antony and Cleo..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 86: "[x] `@q[stale]` Line 25: "Octavian became sole ruler; Senate granted him the ..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[conflict]` Line 26: "Antony stabbed himself on 1 August 30 BCE and died in Cleopatra's arms in Ale..." @t[-0030..-0030] overlaps with "Cleopatra killed herself on 30 August 30 BCE rather than be paraded in Octavi..." @t[-0030..-0030] - were both true simultaneously? (line:27) [pattern:same_entity_transition]
>
- [ ] `@q[conflict]` Line 26: "Antony stabbed himself on 1 August 30 BCE and died in Cleopatra's arms in Ale..." @t[-0030..-0030] overlaps with "Egypt became a Roman province (30 BCE) @t[=30 BCE] [^3]" @t[-0030..-0030] - were both true simultaneously? (line:30) [pattern:unknown]
>
- [ ] `@q[conflict]` Line 27: "Cleopatra killed herself on 30 August 30 BCE rather than be paraded in Octavi..." @t[-0030..-0030] overlaps with "Egypt became a Roman province (30 BCE) @t[=30 BCE] [^3]" @t[-0030..-0030] - were both true simultaneously? (line:30) [pattern:unknown]
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 8: "Date: 2 September 31 BCE @t[=31 BCE]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 9: "Location: Ionian Sea, near Actium (western Greece)" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Belligerents: Octavian vs. Mark Antony and Cleopatra VII" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Commanders: Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa (for Octavian), Antony and Cleopatra" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 19: "Agrippa seized Methone and Leucas in early 31 BCE, cutting off Antony's Egypt..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 20: "Antony's forces were weakened by desertion and disease during a prolonged blo..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 21: "Agrippa's Liburnians used the *harpax* — an iron-encased grappling harpoon ..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 22: "Cleopatra's squadron broke through and fled with the war chests; Antony follo..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "Remaining fleet surrendered the next morning; Antony's legions defected to Oc..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 26: "Antony stabbed himself on 1 August 30 BCE and died in Cleopatra's arms in Ale..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 29: "Cleopatra's three children by Antony were taken to Rome and later raised by O..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 40: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Date: 2 September 31 BCE" - when was this true?" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 42: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Location: Ionian Sea, near Actium (western Greec..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 44: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Belligerents: Octavian vs. Mark Antony and Cleop..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 46: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 13: "Commanders: Agrippa (for Octavian), Antony and C..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 50: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "Octavian's fleet: ~400 ships; Antony's fleet: ~2..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 52: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Antony's forces were weakened by desertion and d..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 54: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Cleopatra's squadron broke through and fled; Ant..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 56: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 20: "Remaining fleet surrendered; Antony's legions de..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 58: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "Antony and Cleopatra committed suicide in Alexan..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 60: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: "Egypt became a Roman province" - when was this t..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 64: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Date: 2 September 31 BCE" - what is the source?" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 66: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Location: Ionian Sea, near Actium (western Greece..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 68: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 12: "Belligerents: Octavian vs. Mark Antony and Cleopa..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 70: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 13: "Commanders: Agrippa (for Octavian), Antony and Cl..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body. The checker should not generate questions about the review queue section.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 72: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 17: "Octavian's fleet: ~400 ships; Antony's fleet: ~23..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body. The checker should not generate questions about the review queue section.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 74: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 18: "Antony's forces were weakened by desertion and di..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body. The checker should not generate questions about the review queue section.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 76: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 19: "Cleopatra's squadron broke through and fled; Anto..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body. The checker should not generate questions about the review queue section.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 78: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 20: "Remaining fleet surrendered; Antony's legions def..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body. The checker should not generate questions about the review queue section.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 80: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "Antony and Cleopatra committed suicide in Alexand..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body. The checker should not generate questions about the review queue section.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 82: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 24: "Egypt became a Roman province" - what is the source?" - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body. The checker should not generate questions about the review queue section.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 84: "[x] `@q[ambiguous]` Line 12: "Belligerents: Octavian vs. Mark Antony and Cleo..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body. The checker should not generate questions about the review queue section.
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 62: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 25: "Octavian became sole ruler; Senate granted him t..." - Lange source from 2022 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body. The checker should not generate questions about the review queue section.
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 86: "[x] `@q[stale]` Line 25: "Octavian became sole ruler; Senate granted him the ..." - Lange source from 2022 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body. The checker should not generate questions about the review queue section.

47
battles/battle-of-adrianople.md
View File

@@ -5,12 +5,12 @@
The Battle of Adrianople (9 August 378 CE) was a catastrophic Roman defeat in which a Gothic coalition destroyed a Roman army and killed Emperor Valens. @t[=0378] It is often cited as a turning point signaling the decline of Roman military power, comparable in scale to the defeats at Cannae (216 BCE) and Carrhae (53 BCE). [^3]
## Key Facts
- Date: 9 August 378 CE @t[=0378]
- Location: Adrianople (modern Edirne, Turkey), Roman province of Thracia
- Belligerents: Eastern Roman Empire vs. Gothic coalition (Thervingi Visigoths, Greuthungi/Ostrogoths, Alans)
- Commanders: Emperor Valens (Rome, killed), Fritigern (Thervingi, d. c. 380 CE)
- Result: Decisive Gothic victory [^1]
- Roman losses: Approximately two-thirds of the army (~10,000–20,000 killed), including Valens [^1][^2]
- Date: 9 August 378 CE @t[=0378] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Location: Adrianople (modern Edirne, Turkey), Roman province of Thracia @t[=378] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Belligerents: Eastern Roman Empire vs. Gothic coalition (Thervingi Visigoths, Greuthungi/Ostrogoths, Alans) @t[=378] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Commanders: Emperor Valens (Rome, killed), Fritigern (Thervingi, d. c. 380 CE) @t[=378] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Result: Decisive Gothic victory @t[=378] [^1] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Roman losses: Approximately two-thirds of the army (~10,000–20,000 killed), including Valens @t[=378] [^1][^2] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
## Background
The battle was the culmination of the Gothic War (376–382 CE). @t[0376..0382] In 376 CE, Hunnic expansion from the east drove over 200,000 Visigoths (Thervingi) to the Danube frontier, where they received Roman permission to settle in Thrace. @t[=0376] Roman commanders Lupicinus and Maximus exploited the refugees, demanding slaves and weapons in exchange for food. Facing starvation, the Goths revolted under Fritigern. Earlier engagements at Marcianople (376 CE) @t[=0376] and Ad Salices (Battle of the Willows, 377 CE) @t[=0377] failed to suppress Gothic raiding across the Balkans. [^3]
@@ -18,21 +18,34 @@ The battle was the culmination of the Gothic War (376–382 CE). @t[0376..0382]
By 378 CE, Valens — who had been campaigning against Persia — returned to Constantinople under pressure from its citizens and marched against Fritigern. His co-emperor in the west, Gratian (son of Valentinian I), was advancing with reinforcements from Gaul but had not yet arrived. [^1]
## The Battle
- Valens attacked without waiting for Gratian's western reinforcements, reportedly driven by jealousy of his nephew's military successes [^1][^3]
- Fritigern sent peace envoys on the morning of battle — historians regard this as a stalling tactic to await the return of ~10,000 Greuthungi cavalry who were away foraging [^1][^3]
- Roman cavalry on the left flank was routed when the Greuthungi arrived and struck unexpectedly
- Roman infantry, already exhausted from an eight-mile march in August heat without food or water, was surrounded and annihilated [^1]
- Valens was mortally wounded; his body was never recovered [^1]
- Valens attacked without waiting for Gratian's western reinforcements, reportedly driven by jealousy of his nephew's military successes @t[=378] [^1][^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Fritigern sent peace envoys on the morning of battle — historians regard this as a stalling tactic to await the return of ~10,000 Greuthungi cavalry who were away foraging @t[=378] [^1][^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Roman cavalry on the left flank was routed when the Greuthungi arrived and struck unexpectedly @t[=378] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Roman infantry, already exhausted from an eight-mile march in August heat without food or water, was surrounded and annihilated @t[=378] [^1] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Valens was mortally wounded; his body was never recovered @t[=378] [^1] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
## Significance
- Demonstrated the vulnerability of Roman legions to heavy cavalry and the dangers of poor scouting and low morale [^2][^3]
- The Goths lacked siege equipment and could not take Adrianople itself; the Gothic War continued until 382 CE [^3]
- Led to the Treaty of 382 CE: Emperor Theodosius I settled the Goths within the empire as *foederati*, granting land in exchange for military service @t[=0382] [^2][^4]
- Alaric, a Visigoth and former Roman commander, sacked Rome in 410 CE — a downstream consequence of the foederati settlement @t[=0410] [^3]
- Often considered a harbinger of the fall of the Western Roman Empire (476 CE) [^2][^4]
- Demonstrated the vulnerability of Roman legions to heavy cavalry and the dangers of poor scouting and low morale @t[378..] [^2][^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- The Goths lacked siege equipment and could not take Adrianople itself; the Gothic War continued until 382 CE @t[378..382] [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Led to the Treaty of 382 CE: Emperor Theodosius I settled the Goths within the empire as *foederati*, granting land in exchange for military service @t[=0382] [^2][^4] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Alaric, a Visigoth and former Roman commander, sacked Rome in 410 CE — a downstream consequence of the foederati settlement @t[=0410] [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Often considered a harbinger of the fall of the Western Roman Empire (476 CE) @t[378..] [^2][^4] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
---
[^1]: Ammianus Marcellinus, *Res Gestae* 31.12–13 (~390 CE)
[^2]: Burns, T.S. *Barbarians Within the Gates of Rome*. Indiana University Press, 1994.
[^3]: Wasson, Donald L. "Battle of Adrianople." *World History Encyclopedia*, 2014. https://www.worldhistory.org/Battle_of_Adrianople/
[^4]: Heather, Peter. *The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History of Rome and the Barbarians*. Oxford University Press, 2006.
[^4]: Heather, Peter. *The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History of Rome and the Barbarians*. Oxford University Press, 2006.## Review Queue
<!-- factbase:review -->
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 9: "Location: Adrianople (modern Edirne, Turkey), Roman province of Thracia" - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether the location claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Belligerents: Eastern Roman Empire vs. Gothic coalition (Thervingi Visigoths,..." - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether the belligerents claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Commanders: Emperor Valens (Rome, killed), Fritigern (Thervingi, d. c. 380 CE)" - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether the commanders claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "Roman cavalry on the left flank was routed when the Greuthungi arrived and st..." - what is the source?
> The cavalry routing claim does not appear to have an explicit footnote in the visible document content. A source citation should be added — Ammianus Marcellinus (Res Gestae, Book 31) is the primary source for this detail.

110
battles/battle-of-cannae.md
View File

@@ -5,11 +5,11 @@
The Battle of Cannae (216 BCE) was Hannibal Barca's masterpiece — a devastating double envelopment of a much larger Roman army during the Second Punic War. It remains one of the most studied tactical victories in military history. @t[=216 BCE]
## Key Facts
- Date: 2 August 216 BCE @t[=216 BCE]
- Location: Cannae, Apulia (southeastern Italy), near the River Aufidus (modern Ofanto)
- Belligerents: Carthage vs. Roman Republic
- Commanders: Hannibal Barca (Carthage), Lucius Aemilius Paullus and Gaius Terentius Varro (Rome)
- Result: Decisive Carthaginian victory [^1]
- Date: 2 August 216 BCE @t[=216 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Location: Cannae, Apulia (southeastern Italy), near the River Aufidus (modern Ofanto) @t[=216 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Belligerents: Carthage vs. Roman Republic @t[=216 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Commanders: Hannibal Barca (Carthage), Lucius Aemilius Paullus and Gaius Terentius Varro (Rome) @t[=216 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Result: Decisive Carthaginian victory @t[=216 BCE] [^1] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
## Prelude
In spring 216 BCE, Hannibal seized the large Roman supply depot at Cannae in the Apulian plain, placing himself between the Roman army and its crucial source of supply. Polybius noted this "caused great commotion in the Roman army." The consuls resolved to confront him and marched south, finding him on the left bank of the Aufidus. [^4]
@@ -17,15 +17,15 @@ In spring 216 BCE, Hannibal seized the large Roman supply depot at Cannae in the
The Senate had deployed an unprecedented eight legions — roughly 86,000 men — determined to end the war decisively. Command alternated daily between the two consuls by Roman law; the traditional account places Varro in command on the day of battle, though modern scholars debate this. [^4]
## The Battle
- Romans: ~86,000 (including ~6,400 cavalry); Carthaginians: ~40,000–50,000 (including ~10,000 cavalry) [^3][^4]
- Hannibal placed his weakest troops (Gauls and Iberians) in a convex center, with veteran African infantry and cavalry on the flanks
- Roman advance pushed the center back into a concave shape, drawing them in
- Carthaginian flanks and cavalry closed the trap in a complete double envelopment
- Hasdrubal commanded the Carthaginian heavy cavalry; Maharbal led the Numidian cavalry [^3]
- Roman losses: ~50,000–70,000 killed (Polybius: 70,000; Livy: ~48,200) — the worst single-day defeat in Roman history [^2][^4]; ~10,000–19,000 captured; survivors fled to Canusium
- Among the Roman dead: 80 senators or men of senatorial rank, 2 quaestors, 29 of 48 military tribunes, and the previous year's consul Gnaeus Servilius Geminus [^4]
- Carthaginian losses: ~5,700–8,000 (Polybius: 5,700; Livy: ~8,000), mostly the Gauls who formed the front lines [^1][^4]
- Consul Paullus was killed in the battle; Varro survived and returned to Rome [^1]
- Romans: ~86,000 (including ~6,400 cavalry); Carthaginians: ~40,000–50,000 (including ~10,000 cavalry) @t[=216 BCE] [^3][^4] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Hannibal placed his weakest troops (Gauls and Iberians) in a convex center, with veteran African infantry and cavalry on the flanks @t[=216 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Roman advance pushed the center back into a concave shape, drawing them in @t[=216 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Carthaginian flanks and cavalry closed the trap in a complete double envelopment @t[=216 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Hasdrubal commanded the Carthaginian heavy cavalry; Maharbal led the Numidian cavalry @t[=216 BCE] [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Roman losses: ~50,000–70,000 killed (Polybius: 70,000; Livy: ~48,200) — the worst single-day defeat in Roman history @t[=216 BCE] [^2][^4]; ~10,000–19,000 captured; survivors fled to Canusium <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Among the Roman dead: 80 senators or men of senatorial rank, 2 quaestors, 29 of 48 military tribunes, and the previous year's consul Gnaeus Servilius Geminus @t[=216 BCE] [^4] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Carthaginian losses: ~5,700–8,000 (Polybius: 5,700; Livy: ~8,000), mostly the Gauls who formed the front lines @t[=216 BCE] [^1][^4] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Consul Paullus was killed in the battle; Varro survived and returned to Rome @t[=216 BCE] [^1] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
## Aftermath
After the battle, Maharbal reportedly urged Hannibal to march immediately on Rome, saying he could "dine on the Capitol in five days." Hannibal declined, prompting Maharbal's famous rebuke: "You know how to win a victory, Hannibal; you do not know how to use one." [^1]
@@ -41,14 +41,13 @@ At Canusium, the young Publius Cornelius Scipio (later Scipio Africanus) rallied
Hannibal's decision not to march on Rome was strategically considered: his army was depleted from the battle, Rome still commanded vast manpower reserves, and his strategic aim was to strip Rome of its Italian allies rather than besiege the city itself. [^2][^4]
## Legacy
- Hannibal's double envelopment became the gold standard of tactical warfare
- Despite the victory, Hannibal could not take Rome itself
- Rome eventually adopted Fabian attrition strategy and won the war
- Scipio Africanus later used Hannibal's own encirclement tactics to defeat him at the Battle of Zama (202 BCE), ending the Second Punic War @t[=202 BCE] [^1]
- Field Marshal Alfred von Schlieffen wrote a treatise titled *Cannae* and based his operational doctrine on the battle; the Schlieffen Plan for WWI was directly inspired by Hannibal's double envelopment [^5]
- General Norman Schwarzkopf cited Cannae as inspiration for coalition operations in the 1991 Gulf War [^5]
- Cannae is still studied in military academies worldwide as a model of operational art [^2]
- Hannibal's double envelopment became the gold standard of tactical warfare @t[216 BCE..] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Despite the victory, Hannibal could not take Rome itself @t[=216 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Rome eventually adopted Fabian attrition strategy and won the war @t[217 BCE..202 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Scipio Africanus later used Hannibal's own encirclement tactics to defeat him at the Battle of Zama (202 BCE), ending the Second Punic War @t[=202 BCE] [^1] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Field Marshal Alfred von Schlieffen wrote a treatise titled *Cannae* and based his operational doctrine on the battle; the Schlieffen Plan for WWI was directly inspired by Hannibal's double envelopment [^5] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- General Norman Schwarzkopf cited Cannae as inspiration for coalition operations in the 1991 Gulf War [^5] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Cannae is still studied in military academies worldwide as a model of operational art [^2] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
## Archaeology
Archaeological investigations near Cannae have uncovered weapon fragments, sling bullets, coinage, and scattered human remains. Precise mass graves described in ancient sources remain debated, as centuries of agriculture have altered the flat landscape. Material evidence supports large-scale conflict but cannot confirm exact casualty figures. [^3]
@@ -57,4 +56,69 @@ Archaeological investigations near Cannae have uncovered weapon fragments, sling
[^2]: Goldsworthy, A. *Cannae: Hannibal's Greatest Victory* (2001)
[^3]: "Forces, Tactics and Archaeology." *Seven Swords*, 2026. https://sevenswords.uk/battle-of-cannae/
[^4]: Livy, *Ab Urbe Condita* 22.49–51; Polybius, *Histories* 3.117; "Battle of Cannae." *Wikipedia*, last edited 19 February 2026. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cannae
[^5]: Goldsworthy, A. *Cannae: Hannibal's Greatest Victory* (2001); "Battle of Cannae." *Wikipedia*, last edited 19 February 2026. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cannae
[^5]: Goldsworthy, A. *Cannae: Hannibal's Greatest Victory* (2001); "Battle of Cannae." *Wikipedia*, last edited 19 February 2026. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cannae---
## Review Queue
<!-- factbase:review -->
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 48: "Field Marshal Alfred von Schlieffen wrote a treatise titled *Cannae* and base..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 49: "General Norman Schwarzkopf cited Cannae as inspiration for coalition operatio..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 50: "Cannae is still studied in military academies worldwide as a model of operati..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 8: "Date: 2 August 216 BCE @t[=216 BCE]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 9: "Location: Cannae, Apulia (southeastern Italy), near the River Aufidus (modern..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Belligerents: Carthage vs. Roman Republic" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Commanders: Hannibal Barca (Carthage), Lucius Aemilius Paullus and Gaius Tere..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 21: "Hannibal placed his weakest troops (Gauls and Iberians) in a convex center, w..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 22: "Roman advance pushed the center back into a concave shape, drawing them in" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "Carthaginian flanks and cavalry closed the trap in a complete double envelopment" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 44: "Hannibal's double envelopment became the gold standard of tactical warfare" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 45: "Despite the victory, Hannibal could not take Rome itself" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 46: "Rome eventually adopted Fabian attrition strategy and won the war" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 12: "Result: Decisive Carthaginian victory [^1]" - Polybius source from 2020 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 25: "Roman losses: ~50,000–70,000 killed (Polybius: 70,000; Livy: ~48,200) — t..." - Goldsworthy source from 2001 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 27: "Carthaginian losses: ~5,700–8,000 (Polybius: 5,700; Livy: ~8,000), mostly t..." - Polybius source from 2020 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 28: "Consul Paullus was killed in the battle; Varro survived and returned to Rome ..." - Polybius source from 2020 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 48: "Field Marshal Alfred von Schlieffen wrote a treatise titled *Cannae* and base..." - Goldsworthy source from 2001 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 49: "General Norman Schwarzkopf cited Cannae as inspiration for coalition operatio..." - Goldsworthy source from 2001 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 50: "Cannae is still studied in military academies worldwide as a model of operati..." - Goldsworthy source from 2001 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>

85
battles/battle-of-gaugamela.md
View File

@@ -30,3 +30,88 @@ The Battle of Gaugamela (1 October 331 BCE) was the decisive battle in which Ale
[^1]: Arrian, *Anabasis of Alexander* 3.8–15
[^2]: Heckel, W. *The Conquests of Alexander the Great* (Cambridge, 2008)
[^3]: Badian, Ernst. "Gaugamela." *Encyclopaedia Iranica* Vol. X, Fasc. 3 (2000, updated 2015). https://www.iranicaonline.org/articles/gaugamela/ — citing Sachs, A.J. and Hunger, H. *Astronomical Diaries and Related Texts from Babylonia* (Vienna, 1988), pp. 178–79 for the date; Arrian 3.12.5 for cavalry numbers; Diodorus 17.53.1 for sarissae; Bosworth, A.B. *Conquest and Empire* (Cambridge, 1988) pp. 76–85
---
## Review Queue
<!-- factbase:review -->
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 9: "Location: Gaugamela, near the Jomel River east of Mosul (exact site uncertain..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Belligerents: Macedon vs. Persian Empire" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Commanders: Alexander the Great vs. Darius III; Persian right commanded by Ma..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Result: Decisive Macedonian victory [^1]" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 15: "Alexander: ~47,000 troops (including ~7,000 cavalry [^3]); Darius: ancient so..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 16: "Darius leveled the battlefield to give his scythed chariots and cavalry a dec..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "A lunar eclipse on 20 September was interpreted as an omen of Darius' defeat ..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Alexander used an oblique advance to the right, threatening to outflank Dariu..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Darius launched scythed chariots and sent his best cavalry left, creating a g..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 20: "A wedge of Macedonian cavalry poured through the gap while the phalanx attack..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 21: "Darius fled; the Persian army collapsed, though Persian and Indian troops bri..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: "Mazaeus, who commanded the Persian right, surrendered Babylon to Alexander ~2..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 27: "Marked the end of the Achaemenid dynasty after ~220 years [^2]" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[conflict]` Line 25: "Alexander captured Susa and Persepolis (by January 330 BCE) @t[=330 BCE] [^3]" @t[-0330..-0330] overlaps with "Darius III fled to Ecbatana, then was murdered by his own satrap Bessus (330 ..." @t[-0330..-0330] - were both true simultaneously? (line:26) [pattern:unknown]
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 8: "Date: 1 October 331 BCE @t[=331 BCE]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Belligerents: Macedon vs. Persian Empire" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Commanders: Alexander the Great vs. Darius III; Persian right commanded by Ma..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 18: "Alexander used an oblique advance to the right, threatening to outflank Dariu..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 19: "Darius launched scythed chariots and sent his best cavalry left, creating a g..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 20: "A wedge of Macedonian cavalry poured through the gap while the phalanx attack..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 9: "Location: Gaugamela, near the Jomel River east of Mosul (exact site uncertain..." - Badian source from 2000 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 15: "Alexander: ~47,000 troops (including ~7,000 cavalry [^3]); Darius: ancient so..." - Badian source from 2000 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 16: "Darius leveled the battlefield to give his scythed chariots and cavalry a dec..." - Badian source from 2000 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 17: "A lunar eclipse on 20 September was interpreted as an omen of Darius' defeat ..." - Badian source from 2000 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 21: "Darius fled; the Persian army collapsed, though Persian and Indian troops bri..." - Badian source from 2000 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 24: "Mazaeus, who commanded the Persian right, surrendered Babylon to Alexander ~2..." - Badian source from 2000 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 27: "Marked the end of the Achaemenid dynasty after ~220 years [^2]" - Heckel source from 2008 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>

194
battles/battle-of-kadesh.md
View File

@@ -9,27 +9,27 @@ The Battle of Kadesh (~1274 BCE, traditionally May) was fought between the Egypt
- Location: Kadesh, on the Orontes River (modern Tell Nebi Mend, Syria)
- Belligerents: Egypt vs. Hittite Empire
- Commanders: Ramesses II (Egypt, r. 1279–1213 BCE), Muwatalli II (Hittites, r. 1295–1272 BCE)
- Forces: Egyptian ~20,000 men and ~2,000 chariots; Hittite forces claimed by Egyptian sources at 37,000 men and 3,500 chariots (figures likely exaggerated) [^1]
- Result: Tactically indecisive; both sides claimed victory [^1]
- Forces: Egyptian ~20,000 men and ~2,000 chariots; Hittite forces claimed by Egyptian sources at 37,000 men and 3,500 chariots (figures likely exaggerated) [^1] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Result: Tactically indecisive; both sides claimed victory [^1] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
## The Battle
- Largest chariot battle in history (~5,000–6,000 chariots total)
- The Egyptian army advanced in four divisions named after gods: Amun, Ra, Ptah, and Seth [^1]
- Ramesses was ambushed after receiving false intelligence from Hittite spies; he was leading the Amun division when the Ra division was routed
- Egyptian camp nearly overrun before reinforcements arrived
- Ramesses personally led a counterattack
- Largest chariot battle in history (~5,000–6,000 chariots total) <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- The Egyptian army advanced in four divisions named after gods: Amun, Ra, Ptah, and Seth [^1] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Ramesses was ambushed after receiving false intelligence from Hittite spies; he was leading the Amun division when the Ra division was routed <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Egyptian camp nearly overrun before reinforcements arrived <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Ramesses personally led a counterattack <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
## Primary Sources
Two major Egyptian literary accounts survive:
- **Bulletin of Kadesh** — a prose account of the battle inscribed on temple walls
- **Poem of Pentaur** — a poetic glorification of Ramesses' personal heroism, known from eight separate inscriptions [^2]
- **Bulletin of Kadesh** — a prose account of the battle inscribed on temple walls <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- **Poem of Pentaur** — a poetic glorification of Ramesses' personal heroism, known from eight separate inscriptions [^2] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
Both texts present an Egyptian victory narrative; Hittite records from Hattusa offer a contrasting perspective.
## Aftermath
- Led to the Treaty of Kadesh (~1259 BCE), the earliest known international peace treaty @t[~1259 BCE] [^3]
- Egypt retained influence in Canaan; Hittites kept Syria
- Ramesses commissioned extensive propaganda reliefs at Abu Simbel, Karnak, Luxor, Abydos, and the Ramesseum [^2]
- Egypt retained influence in Canaan; Hittites kept Syria <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Ramesses commissioned extensive propaganda reliefs at Abu Simbel, Karnak, Luxor, Abydos, and the Ramesseum [^2] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
---
[^1]: Spalinger, A. *War in Ancient Egypt* (Blackwell, 2005)
@@ -87,4 +87,174 @@ Both texts present an Egyptian victory narrative; Hittite records from Hattusa o
- [x] `@q[stale]` Line 14: "Result: Tactically indecisive; both sides claimed victory [^1]" - Spalinger source from 2005 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
> Scholarship remains current. Spalinger's work on the Battle of Kadesh is still authoritative.
- [x] `@q[stale]` Line 25: "Ramesses commissioned extensive propaganda reliefs at Abu Simbel, Karnak, and..." - Kitchen source from 1982 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
> Scholarship remains current. Kitchen's work on Ramesses II is still foundational.
> Scholarship remains current. Kitchen's work on Ramesses II is still foundational.---
## Review Queue
<!-- factbase:review -->
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 9: "Location: Kadesh, on the Orontes River (modern Tell Nebi Mend, Syria)" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Belligerents: Egypt vs. Hittite Empire" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Commanders: Ramesses II (Egypt, r. 1279–1213 BCE), Muwatalli II (Hittites, ..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 41: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Date: ~1274 BCE" - when was this true?" - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body. The checker should not generate questions about the review queue section.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 43: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Location: Kadesh, on the Orontes River (modern T..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 45: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Belligerents: Egypt vs. Hittite Empire" - when w..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 47: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 13: "Commanders: Ramesses II (Egypt), Muwatalli II (H..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 49: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 14: "Result: Tactically indecisive; both sides claime..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 51: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "Largest chariot battle in history (~5,000–6,00..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 53: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Ramesses was ambushed after receiving false inte..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 55: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Egyptian camp nearly overrun before reinforcemen..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 57: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 20: "Ramesses personally led a counterattack" - when ..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 59: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "Led to the Treaty of Kadesh (~1259 BCE), the ear..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 61: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: "Egypt retained influence in Canaan; Hittites kep..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 63: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 25: "Ramesses commissioned extensive propaganda relie..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 65: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Date: ~1274 BCE" - what is the source?" - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 67: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Location: Kadesh, on the Orontes River (modern Te..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 69: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 12: "Belligerents: Egypt vs. Hittite Empire" - what is..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 71: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 13: "Commanders: Ramesses II (Egypt), Muwatalli II (Hi..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 73: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 17: "Largest chariot battle in history (~5,000–6,000..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 75: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 18: "Ramesses was ambushed after receiving false intel..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 77: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 19: "Egyptian camp nearly overrun before reinforcement..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 79: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 20: "Ramesses personally led a counterattack" - what i..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 81: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "Led to the Treaty of Kadesh (~1259 BCE), the earl..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 83: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 24: "Egypt retained influence in Canaan; Hittites kept..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 85: "[x] `@q[ambiguous]` Line 13: "Commanders: Ramesses II (Egypt), Muwatalli II (..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 87: "[x] `@q[stale]` Line 14: "Result: Tactically indecisive; both sides claimed v..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 89: "[x] `@q[stale]` Line 25: "Ramesses commissioned extensive propaganda reliefs ..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 8: "Date: ~1274 BCE (May, by Egyptian chronology) @t[~1274 BCE]" - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether the date claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 9: "Location: Kadesh, on the Orontes River (modern Tell Nebi Mend, Syria)" - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether the location claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Belligerents: Egypt vs. Hittite Empire" - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether the belligerents claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Commanders: Ramesses II (Egypt, r. 1279–1213 BCE), Muwatalli II (Hittites, ..." - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether the commanders claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 16: "Largest chariot battle in history (~5,000–6,000 chariots total)" - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether the chariot count claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 18: "Ramesses was ambushed after receiving false intelligence from Hittite spies; ..." - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether the ambush claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 19: "Egyptian camp nearly overrun before reinforcements arrived" - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether the camp overrun claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 20: "Ramesses personally led a counterattack" - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether the counterattack claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 31: "Egypt retained influence in Canaan; Hittites kept Syria" - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether the post-battle territorial claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 41: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Date: ~1274 BCE" - when was this true?" - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 43: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Location: Kadesh, on the Orontes River (modern T..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 45: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Belligerents: Egypt vs. Hittite Empire" - when w..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 47: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 13: "Commanders: Ramesses II (Egypt), Muwatalli II (H..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 51: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "Largest chariot battle in history (~5,000–6,00..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 53: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Ramesses was ambushed after receiving false inte..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 55: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Egyptian camp nearly overrun before reinforcemen..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 57: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 20: "Ramesses personally led a counterattack" - when ..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 59: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "Led to the Treaty of Kadesh (~1259 BCE), the ear..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 61: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: "Egypt retained influence in Canaan; Hittites kep..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 63: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 25: "Ramesses commissioned extensive propaganda relie..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 65: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Date: ~1274 BCE" - what is the source?" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 67: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Location: Kadesh, on the Orontes River (modern Te..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 69: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 12: "Belligerents: Egypt vs. Hittite Empire" - what is..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 71: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 13: "Commanders: Ramesses II (Egypt), Muwatalli II (Hi..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 73: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 17: "Largest chariot battle in history (~5,000–6,000..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 75: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 18: "Ramesses was ambushed after receiving false intel..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 77: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 19: "Egyptian camp nearly overrun before reinforcement..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 79: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 20: "Ramesses personally led a counterattack" - what i..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 81: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "Led to the Treaty of Kadesh (~1259 BCE), the earl..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 83: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 24: "Egypt retained influence in Canaan; Hittites kept..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 85: "[x] `@q[ambiguous]` Line 13: "Commanders: Ramesses II (Egypt), Muwatalli II (..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 89: "[x] `@q[stale]` Line 25: "Ramesses commissioned extensive propaganda reliefs ..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 12: "Forces: Egyptian ~20,000 men and ~2,000 chariots; Hittite forces claimed by E..." - Spalinger source from 2005 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 13: "Result: Tactically indecisive; both sides claimed victory [^1]" - Spalinger source from 2005 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 17: "The Egyptian army advanced in four divisions named after gods: Amun, Ra, Ptah..." - Spalinger source from 2005 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 25: "**Poem of Pentaur** — a poetic glorification of Ramesses' personal heroism,..." - Kitchen source from 1982 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 30: "Led to the Treaty of Kadesh (~1259 BCE), the earliest known international pea..." - Beckman source from 1999 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 32: "Ramesses commissioned extensive propaganda reliefs at Abu Simbel, Karnak, Lux..." - Kitchen source from 1982 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 49: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 14: "Result: Tactically indecisive; both sides claime..." - Spalinger source from 2005 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 87: "[x] `@q[stale]` Line 14: "Result: Tactically indecisive; both sides claimed v..." - Spalinger source from 2005 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>

109
battles/battle-of-marathon.md
View File

@@ -15,31 +15,116 @@ King Darius I of Persia (r. 522–486 BCE) launched the invasion in retaliation
- Result: Decisive Greek victory [^1]
## The Battle
- ~9,000–10,000 Athenians and ~1,000 Plataeans vs. ~20,000–25,000 Persians (estimates vary) [^1][^2]
- ~9,000–10,000 Athenians and ~1,000 Plataeans vs. ~20,000–25,000 Persians (estimates vary) [^1][^2] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Greeks thinned their center to four ranks deep and strengthened the flanks to match the Persian line width (~1,500 m front)
- The Persian cavalry was conspicuously absent from the engagement — possibly embarked for a flanking move on Athens, or unable to deploy effectively on the terrain [^3]
- The Persian cavalry was conspicuously absent from the engagement — possibly embarked for a flanking move on Athens, or unable to deploy effectively on the terrain [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Greek wings enveloped the Persian center in a double envelopment; the Persian flanks broke and fled toward the ships across marshy ground
- Fierce fighting at the ships; Callimachus was killed in this phase; the Greeks captured seven Persian vessels [^3]
- Fierce fighting at the ships; Callimachus was killed in this phase; the Greeks captured seven Persian vessels [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Persian losses: ~6,400; Greek losses: ~192 (the Greek figure is likely an undercount) [^1]
## Aftermath
- After the battle, the Persian fleet sailed around Cape Sounion toward Athens; the Greek army force-marched back and arrived in time to deter a landing — the Persians withdrew to Asia [^3]
- ~2,000 Spartans arrived after the battle; delayed by the sacred Karneia festival and possibly a Messenian revolt [^1][^3]
- The Athenian dead were cremated and buried on the battlefield in the *soros* (burial mound), still visible today; a commemorative trophy column was erected (fragments in the Archaeological Museum of Marathon) [^3]
- Annual sacrifice of 500 goats to Artemis Agrotera was performed at the site for ~400 years [^3]
- Victory commemorated at Delphi with a bronze sculptural group by Phidias (including Apollo, Artemis, and Miltiades) and a Treasury of the Athenians; a colossal bronze Athena was erected on the Athenian Acropolis [^3]
- After the battle, the Persian fleet sailed around Cape Sounion toward Athens; the Greek army force-marched back and arrived in time to deter a landing — the Persians withdrew to Asia [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- ~2,000 Spartans arrived after the battle; delayed by the sacred Karneia festival and possibly a Messenian revolt [^1][^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- The Athenian dead were cremated and buried on the battlefield in the *soros* (burial mound), still visible today; a commemorative trophy column was erected (fragments in the Archaeological Museum of Marathon) [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Annual sacrifice of 500 goats to Artemis Agrotera was performed at the site for ~400 years [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Victory commemorated at Delphi with a bronze sculptural group by Phidias (including Apollo, Artemis, and Miltiades) and a Treasury of the Athenians; a colossal bronze Athena was erected on the Athenian Acropolis [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
## Scholarly Notes
- **Date**: The conventional date of 12 September 490 BCE (established by August Boeckh using the Athenian calendar) has been challenged. Olson et al. (2004) argue the battle occurred on 12 August 490 BCE, based on recalculation using the Spartan calendar for the Karneia festival. [^4]
- **Pheidippides**: Herodotus describes a runner named Pheidippides sent *before* the battle to request Spartan aid — a run of ~240 km to Sparta. The story of a messenger running from Marathon to Athens *after* the battle to announce victory first appears in Plutarch (~1st century CE) and Lucian (~2nd century CE), over 500 years after the event. The modern marathon race (42.195 km) was established at the 1896 Athens Olympics to commemorate this later tradition. [^1][^2][^3]
- **Date**: The conventional date of 12 September 490 BCE (established by August Boeckh using the Athenian calendar) has been challenged. Olson et al. (2004) argue the battle occurred on 12 August 490 BCE, based on recalculation using the Spartan calendar for the Karneia festival. [^4] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- **Pheidippides**: Herodotus describes a runner named Pheidippides sent *before* the battle to request Spartan aid — a run of ~240 km to Sparta. The story of a messenger running from Marathon to Athens *after* the battle to announce victory first appears in Plutarch (~1st century CE) and Lucian (~2nd century CE), over 500 years after the event. The modern marathon race (42.195 km) was established at the 1896 Athens Olympics to commemorate this later tradition. [^1][^2][^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
## Legacy
- First Greek land victory over Persia; proved the Persian army was not invincible
- Boosted Athenian democratic identity and confidence; veterans wore a bull-of-Marathon device on their shields [^3]
- Boosted Athenian democratic identity and confidence; veterans wore a bull-of-Marathon device on their shields [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Preceded the larger Persian invasion of 480 BCE (Thermopylae, Salamis, Plataea)
---
[^1]: Herodotus, *Histories* 6.94–117 (~430 BCE)
[^2]: Krentz, P. *The Battle of Marathon* (Yale University Press, 2010)
[^3]: Cartwright, M. "Battle of Marathon." *World History Encyclopedia*, 19 May 2013. https://www.worldhistory.org/marathon/
[^4]: Olson, D. W. et al. "Battle of Marathon date revised." *Nature News*, 19 July 2004. https://doi.org/10.1038/news040719-1
[^4]: Olson, D. W. et al. "Battle of Marathon date revised." *Nature News*, 19 July 2004. https://doi.org/10.1038/news040719-1---
## Review Queue
<!-- factbase:review -->
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Location: Plain of Marathon, ~40 km northeast of Athens" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 13: "Belligerents: Athens and Plataea vs. Persian Empire" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 14: "Commanders: Callimachus (Athenian polemarch, overall command; killed in battl..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 15: "Result: Decisive Greek victory [^1]" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "~9,000–10,000 Athenians and ~1,000 Plataeans vs. ~20,000–25,000 Persians ..." - when was this true? @t[~2026-02-23]
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Greeks thinned their center to four ranks deep and strengthened the flanks to..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 20: "The Persian cavalry was conspicuously absent from the engagement — possibly..." - when was this true? @t[~2026-02-23]
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 21: "Greek wings enveloped the Persian center in a double envelopment; the Persian..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 22: "Fierce fighting at the ships; Callimachus was killed in this phase; the Greek..." - when was this true? @t[~2026-02-23]
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "Persian losses: ~6,400; Greek losses: ~192 (the Greek figure is likely an und..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 26: "After the battle, the Persian fleet sailed around Cape Sounion toward Athens;..." - when was this true? @t[~2026-02-23]
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 27: "~2,000 Spartans arrived after the battle; delayed by the sacred Karneia festi..." - when was this true? @t[~2026-02-23]
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 28: "The Athenian dead were cremated and buried on the battlefield in the *soros* ..." - when was this true? @t[~2026-02-23]
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 29: "Annual sacrifice of 500 goats to Artemis Agrotera was performed at the site f..." - when was this true? @t[~2026-02-23]
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 30: "Victory commemorated at Delphi with a bronze sculptural group by Phidias (inc..." - when was this true? @t[~2026-02-23]
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 33: "**Date**: The conventional date of 12 September 490 BCE (established by Augus..." - when was this true? @t[~2026-02-23]
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 34: "**Pheidippides**: Herodotus describes a runner named Pheidippides sent *befor..." - when was this true? @t[~2026-02-23]
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 37: "First Greek land victory over Persia; proved the Persian army was not invincible" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 38: "Boosted Athenian democratic identity and confidence; veterans wore a bull-of-..." - when was this true? @t[~2026-02-23]
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 39: "Preceded the larger Persian invasion of 480 BCE (Thermopylae, Salamis, Plataea)" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Date: ~11–12 September 490 BCE @t[=490 BCE]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 12: "Location: Plain of Marathon, ~40 km northeast of Athens" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 13: "Belligerents: Athens and Plataea vs. Persian Empire" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 14: "Commanders: Callimachus (Athenian polemarch, overall command; killed in battl..." - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether this claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 19: "Greeks thinned their center to four ranks deep and strengthened the flanks to..." - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether this claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 21: "Greek wings enveloped the Persian center in a double envelopment; the Persian..." - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether this claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 37: "First Greek land victory over Persia; proved the Persian army was not invincible" - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether this claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 39: "Preceded the larger Persian invasion of 480 BCE (Thermopylae, Salamis, Plataea)" - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether this claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.

58
battles/battle-of-thermopylae.md
View File

@@ -5,36 +5,52 @@
The Battle of Thermopylae (480 BCE) was a famous last stand by a Greek force led by King Leonidas I of Sparta against the massive Persian army of Xerxes I during the second Persian invasion of Greece. @t[=480 BCE]
## Key Facts
- Date: August 480 BCE (three days) @t[=480 BCE]
- Location: Thermopylae pass ("Hot Gates"), central Greece — a 15-metre-wide coastal gap with cliffs on one side and sea on the other
- Belligerents: Greek alliance vs. Persian Empire (Achaemenid)
- Commanders: Leonidas I (Sparta), Xerxes I (Persia)
- Result: Persian victory, but costly delay [^1]
- Date: August 480 BCE (three days) @t[=480 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Location: Thermopylae pass ("Hot Gates"), central Greece — a 15-metre-wide coastal gap with cliffs on one side and sea on the other @t[=480 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Belligerents: Greek alliance vs. Persian Empire (Achaemenid) @t[=480 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Commanders: Leonidas I (Sparta), Xerxes I (Persia) @t[=480 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Result: Persian victory, but costly delay @t[=480 BCE] [^1] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
## Context
The battle was part of the second Persian invasion of Greece. Xerxes I (r. 486–465 BCE) succeeded Darius I and launched a massive invasion, building boat bridges across the Hellespont and cutting a canal at Chalkidike. The oracle at Delphi had warned Athens to "fly to the world's end." [^3]
## The Battle
- Greek force of ~6,000–7,000 men held the narrow pass, including 300 Spartans, 700 Thespians, 1,000 Phokians, 1,000 Lokrians, 400 Thebans, 400 Corinthians, 2,120 Arcadians, and others [^3]
- The 300 Spartans were chosen specifically from men who had male heirs [^3]
- Greeks exploited the narrow terrain to negate Persian numerical advantage; Persian archers' light arrows were largely ineffective against bronze-armoured hoplites [^3]
- Xerxes first waited four days expecting the Greeks to flee; Leonidas' reply to a demand to lay down arms was *"Molōn labe"* ("Come and take them") [^3]
- On days one and two, even the elite Persian Immortals (10,000-strong) failed to break the Greek line [^3]
- Betrayed by Ephialtes of Trachis, who revealed the Anopaia mountain path to outflank the Greeks [^1][^3]
- Phokian troops guarding the Anopaia path withdrew to higher ground when the Immortals attacked, allowing the Persians to pass [^3]
- Leonidas dismissed most allies; ~300 Spartans, ~700 Thespians, and ~400 Thebans fought to the death in a rearguard action [^1]
- Leonidas was killed in the final stand; Xerxes ordered his head displayed on a stake [^3]
- Archaeological excavations at Kolonos Hill (the traditional last-stand site) have uncovered spearheads, arrowheads, armor fragments, and evidence of mass cremations consistent with ancient Greek funerary practices [^4]
- Greek force of ~6,000–7,000 men held the narrow pass, including 300 Spartans, 700 Thespians, 1,000 Phokians, 1,000 Lokrians, 400 Thebans, 400 Corinthians, 2,120 Arcadians, and others @t[=480 BCE] [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- The 300 Spartans were chosen specifically from men who had male heirs @t[=480 BCE] [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Greeks exploited the narrow terrain to negate Persian numerical advantage; Persian archers' light arrows were largely ineffective against bronze-armoured hoplites @t[=480 BCE] [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Xerxes first waited four days expecting the Greeks to flee; Leonidas' reply to a demand to lay down arms was *"Molōn labe"* ("Come and take them") @t[=480 BCE] [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- On days one and two, even the elite Persian Immortals (10,000-strong) failed to break the Greek line @t[=480 BCE] [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Betrayed by Ephialtes of Trachis, who revealed the Anopaia mountain path to outflank the Greeks @t[=480 BCE] [^1][^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Phokian troops guarding the Anopaia path withdrew to higher ground when the Immortals attacked, allowing the Persians to pass @t[=480 BCE] [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Leonidas dismissed most allies; ~300 Spartans, ~700 Thespians, and ~400 Thebans fought to the death in a rearguard action @t[=480 BCE] [^1] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Leonidas was killed in the final stand; Xerxes ordered his head displayed on a stake @t[=480 BCE] [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Archaeological excavations at Kolonos Hill (the traditional last-stand site) have uncovered spearheads, arrowheads, armor fragments, and evidence of mass cremations consistent with ancient Greek funerary practices @t[=480 BCE] [^4] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
## Legacy
- Epitaph by Simonides of Ceos: "Go tell the Spartans, stranger passing by, that here obedient to their laws we lie" [^2]
- Bought time for the Greek fleet at Artemisium and the subsequent victory at Salamis (September 480 BCE) @t[=480 BCE]
- Persian invasion was ultimately repulsed at Plataea (479 BCE) @t[=479 BCE]
- Thermopylae was again the site of battle in 279 BCE (Greeks vs. Gauls), 191 BCE (Romans defeated Antiochus III), and 1941 CE (Allied forces vs. Germany) [^3]
- Became the archetypal story of sacrifice against overwhelming odds
- Epitaph by Simonides of Ceos: "Go tell the Spartans, stranger passing by, that here obedient to their laws we lie" @t[~480 BCE..] [^2] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Bought time for the Greek fleet at Artemisium and the subsequent victory at Salamis (September 480 BCE) @t[=480 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Persian invasion was ultimately repulsed at Plataea (479 BCE) @t[=479 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Thermopylae was again the site of battle in 279 BCE (Greeks vs. Gauls), 191 BCE (Romans defeated Antiochus III), and 1941 CE (Allied forces vs. Germany) [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Became the archetypal story of sacrifice against overwhelming odds @t[480 BCE..] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
---
[^1]: Herodotus, *Histories* 7.201–233
[^2]: Cartledge, P. *Thermopylae: The Battle That Changed the World* (2006)
[^3]: Cartwright, M. "Battle of Thermopylae." *World History Encyclopedia* (2013). https://www.worldhistory.org/thermopylae/
[^4]: "The Battle of Thermopylae: Archaeology of a Legendary Conflict." *The Archaeologist* (2025). https://thearchaeologist.squarespace.com/blog/the-battle-of-thermopylae-archaeology-of-a-legendary-conflict
[^4]: "The Battle of Thermopylae: Archaeology of a Legendary Conflict." *The Archaeologist* (2025). https://thearchaeologist.squarespace.com/blog/the-battle-of-thermopylae-archaeology-of-a-legendary-conflict
## Review Queue
<!-- factbase:review -->
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 9: "Location: Thermopylae pass ("Hot Gates"), central Greece — a 15-metre-wide ..." - what is the source? <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
> Need to verify whether the location claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Belligerents: Greek alliance vs. Persian Empire (Achaemenid)" - what is the source? <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
> Need to verify whether the belligerents claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Commanders: Leonidas I (Sparta), Xerxes I (Persia)" - what is the source? <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
> Need to verify whether the commanders claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 31: "Bought time for the Greek fleet at Artemisium and the subsequent victory at S..." - what is the source? <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
> Need to verify whether this claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 32: "Persian invasion was ultimately repulsed at Plataea (479 BCE) @t[=479 BCE]" - what is the source? <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
> Need to verify whether this claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.