daniel/factbase-ancient-history
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Fix deep scan: log output even on failure, capture exit code for debugging

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
daniel
2026-02-23 12:30:19 +00:00
parent 34d444aa17
commit 517c8f2cd0
71 changed files with 6824 additions and 333 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

110
battles/battle-of-cannae.md
View File

@@ -5,11 +5,11 @@
The Battle of Cannae (216 BCE) was Hannibal Barca's masterpiece — a devastating double envelopment of a much larger Roman army during the Second Punic War. It remains one of the most studied tactical victories in military history. @t[=216 BCE]
## Key Facts
- Date: 2 August 216 BCE @t[=216 BCE]
- Location: Cannae, Apulia (southeastern Italy), near the River Aufidus (modern Ofanto)
- Belligerents: Carthage vs. Roman Republic
- Commanders: Hannibal Barca (Carthage), Lucius Aemilius Paullus and Gaius Terentius Varro (Rome)
- Result: Decisive Carthaginian victory [^1]
- Date: 2 August 216 BCE @t[=216 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Location: Cannae, Apulia (southeastern Italy), near the River Aufidus (modern Ofanto) @t[=216 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Belligerents: Carthage vs. Roman Republic @t[=216 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Commanders: Hannibal Barca (Carthage), Lucius Aemilius Paullus and Gaius Terentius Varro (Rome) @t[=216 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Result: Decisive Carthaginian victory @t[=216 BCE] [^1] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
## Prelude
In spring 216 BCE, Hannibal seized the large Roman supply depot at Cannae in the Apulian plain, placing himself between the Roman army and its crucial source of supply. Polybius noted this "caused great commotion in the Roman army." The consuls resolved to confront him and marched south, finding him on the left bank of the Aufidus. [^4]
@@ -17,15 +17,15 @@ In spring 216 BCE, Hannibal seized the large Roman supply depot at Cannae in the
The Senate had deployed an unprecedented eight legions — roughly 86,000 men — determined to end the war decisively. Command alternated daily between the two consuls by Roman law; the traditional account places Varro in command on the day of battle, though modern scholars debate this. [^4]
## The Battle
- Romans: ~86,000 (including ~6,400 cavalry); Carthaginians: ~40,000–50,000 (including ~10,000 cavalry) [^3][^4]
- Hannibal placed his weakest troops (Gauls and Iberians) in a convex center, with veteran African infantry and cavalry on the flanks
- Roman advance pushed the center back into a concave shape, drawing them in
- Carthaginian flanks and cavalry closed the trap in a complete double envelopment
- Hasdrubal commanded the Carthaginian heavy cavalry; Maharbal led the Numidian cavalry [^3]
- Roman losses: ~50,000–70,000 killed (Polybius: 70,000; Livy: ~48,200) — the worst single-day defeat in Roman history [^2][^4]; ~10,000–19,000 captured; survivors fled to Canusium
- Among the Roman dead: 80 senators or men of senatorial rank, 2 quaestors, 29 of 48 military tribunes, and the previous year's consul Gnaeus Servilius Geminus [^4]
- Carthaginian losses: ~5,700–8,000 (Polybius: 5,700; Livy: ~8,000), mostly the Gauls who formed the front lines [^1][^4]
- Consul Paullus was killed in the battle; Varro survived and returned to Rome [^1]
- Romans: ~86,000 (including ~6,400 cavalry); Carthaginians: ~40,000–50,000 (including ~10,000 cavalry) @t[=216 BCE] [^3][^4] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Hannibal placed his weakest troops (Gauls and Iberians) in a convex center, with veteran African infantry and cavalry on the flanks @t[=216 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Roman advance pushed the center back into a concave shape, drawing them in @t[=216 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Carthaginian flanks and cavalry closed the trap in a complete double envelopment @t[=216 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Hasdrubal commanded the Carthaginian heavy cavalry; Maharbal led the Numidian cavalry @t[=216 BCE] [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Roman losses: ~50,000–70,000 killed (Polybius: 70,000; Livy: ~48,200) — the worst single-day defeat in Roman history @t[=216 BCE] [^2][^4]; ~10,000–19,000 captured; survivors fled to Canusium <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Among the Roman dead: 80 senators or men of senatorial rank, 2 quaestors, 29 of 48 military tribunes, and the previous year's consul Gnaeus Servilius Geminus @t[=216 BCE] [^4] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Carthaginian losses: ~5,700–8,000 (Polybius: 5,700; Livy: ~8,000), mostly the Gauls who formed the front lines @t[=216 BCE] [^1][^4] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Consul Paullus was killed in the battle; Varro survived and returned to Rome @t[=216 BCE] [^1] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
## Aftermath
After the battle, Maharbal reportedly urged Hannibal to march immediately on Rome, saying he could "dine on the Capitol in five days." Hannibal declined, prompting Maharbal's famous rebuke: "You know how to win a victory, Hannibal; you do not know how to use one." [^1]
@@ -41,14 +41,13 @@ At Canusium, the young Publius Cornelius Scipio (later Scipio Africanus) rallied
Hannibal's decision not to march on Rome was strategically considered: his army was depleted from the battle, Rome still commanded vast manpower reserves, and his strategic aim was to strip Rome of its Italian allies rather than besiege the city itself. [^2][^4]
## Legacy
- Hannibal's double envelopment became the gold standard of tactical warfare
- Despite the victory, Hannibal could not take Rome itself
- Rome eventually adopted Fabian attrition strategy and won the war
- Scipio Africanus later used Hannibal's own encirclement tactics to defeat him at the Battle of Zama (202 BCE), ending the Second Punic War @t[=202 BCE] [^1]
- Field Marshal Alfred von Schlieffen wrote a treatise titled *Cannae* and based his operational doctrine on the battle; the Schlieffen Plan for WWI was directly inspired by Hannibal's double envelopment [^5]
- General Norman Schwarzkopf cited Cannae as inspiration for coalition operations in the 1991 Gulf War [^5]
- Cannae is still studied in military academies worldwide as a model of operational art [^2]
- Hannibal's double envelopment became the gold standard of tactical warfare @t[216 BCE..] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Despite the victory, Hannibal could not take Rome itself @t[=216 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Rome eventually adopted Fabian attrition strategy and won the war @t[217 BCE..202 BCE] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Scipio Africanus later used Hannibal's own encirclement tactics to defeat him at the Battle of Zama (202 BCE), ending the Second Punic War @t[=202 BCE] [^1] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Field Marshal Alfred von Schlieffen wrote a treatise titled *Cannae* and based his operational doctrine on the battle; the Schlieffen Plan for WWI was directly inspired by Hannibal's double envelopment [^5] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- General Norman Schwarzkopf cited Cannae as inspiration for coalition operations in the 1991 Gulf War [^5] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Cannae is still studied in military academies worldwide as a model of operational art [^2] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
## Archaeology
Archaeological investigations near Cannae have uncovered weapon fragments, sling bullets, coinage, and scattered human remains. Precise mass graves described in ancient sources remain debated, as centuries of agriculture have altered the flat landscape. Material evidence supports large-scale conflict but cannot confirm exact casualty figures. [^3]
@@ -57,4 +56,69 @@ Archaeological investigations near Cannae have uncovered weapon fragments, sling
[^2]: Goldsworthy, A. *Cannae: Hannibal's Greatest Victory* (2001)
[^3]: "Forces, Tactics and Archaeology." *Seven Swords*, 2026. https://sevenswords.uk/battle-of-cannae/
[^4]: Livy, *Ab Urbe Condita* 22.49–51; Polybius, *Histories* 3.117; "Battle of Cannae." *Wikipedia*, last edited 19 February 2026. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cannae
[^5]: Goldsworthy, A. *Cannae: Hannibal's Greatest Victory* (2001); "Battle of Cannae." *Wikipedia*, last edited 19 February 2026. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cannae
[^5]: Goldsworthy, A. *Cannae: Hannibal's Greatest Victory* (2001); "Battle of Cannae." *Wikipedia*, last edited 19 February 2026. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Cannae---
## Review Queue
<!-- factbase:review -->
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 48: "Field Marshal Alfred von Schlieffen wrote a treatise titled *Cannae* and base..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 49: "General Norman Schwarzkopf cited Cannae as inspiration for coalition operatio..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 50: "Cannae is still studied in military academies worldwide as a model of operati..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 8: "Date: 2 August 216 BCE @t[=216 BCE]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 9: "Location: Cannae, Apulia (southeastern Italy), near the River Aufidus (modern..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Belligerents: Carthage vs. Roman Republic" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Commanders: Hannibal Barca (Carthage), Lucius Aemilius Paullus and Gaius Tere..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 21: "Hannibal placed his weakest troops (Gauls and Iberians) in a convex center, w..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 22: "Roman advance pushed the center back into a concave shape, drawing them in" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "Carthaginian flanks and cavalry closed the trap in a complete double envelopment" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 44: "Hannibal's double envelopment became the gold standard of tactical warfare" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 45: "Despite the victory, Hannibal could not take Rome itself" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 46: "Rome eventually adopted Fabian attrition strategy and won the war" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 12: "Result: Decisive Carthaginian victory [^1]" - Polybius source from 2020 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 25: "Roman losses: ~50,000–70,000 killed (Polybius: 70,000; Livy: ~48,200) — t..." - Goldsworthy source from 2001 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 27: "Carthaginian losses: ~5,700–8,000 (Polybius: 5,700; Livy: ~8,000), mostly t..." - Polybius source from 2020 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 28: "Consul Paullus was killed in the battle; Varro survived and returned to Rome ..." - Polybius source from 2020 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 48: "Field Marshal Alfred von Schlieffen wrote a treatise titled *Cannae* and base..." - Goldsworthy source from 2001 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 49: "General Norman Schwarzkopf cited Cannae as inspiration for coalition operatio..." - Goldsworthy source from 2001 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 50: "Cannae is still studied in military academies worldwide as a model of operati..." - Goldsworthy source from 2001 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>