Fix deep scan: log output even on failure, capture exit code for debugging

This commit is contained in:
daniel
2026-02-23 12:30:19 +00:00
parent 34d444aa17
commit 517c8f2cd0
71 changed files with 6824 additions and 333 deletions

View File

@@ -18,13 +18,13 @@ The Maurya Empire (~322185 BCE) was the first empire to unify most of the Ind
## Achievements
- Unified most of the Indian subcontinent for the first time
- Ashoka's edicts: 33 inscriptions on pillars, boulders, and cave walls — the earliest deciphered Indian inscriptions, promoting non-violence and tolerance [^2]
- *Arthashastra* attributed to Chanakya (also known as Kautilya or Vishnugupta): comprehensive treatise on statecraft, economics, and military strategy [^3]
- Ashoka's edicts: 33 inscriptions on pillars, boulders, and cave walls — the earliest deciphered Indian inscriptions, promoting non-violence and tolerance [^2] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- *Arthashastra* attributed to Chanakya (also known as Kautilya or Vishnugupta): comprehensive treatise on statecraft, economics, and military strategy [^3] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Extensive road network and trade connections linking the subcontinent
## Administration
- Highly centralized bureaucracy with provincial governors (*kumara*) and an extensive spy network maintaining central control
- Megasthenes, Greek ambassador to Chandragupta's court (~302 BCE), described the empire's administration and society in *Indica* (survives in fragments quoted by Strabo and Arrian) [^4]
- Megasthenes, Greek ambassador to Chandragupta's court (~302 BCE), described the empire's administration and society in *Indica* (survives in fragments quoted by Strabo and Arrian) [^4] <!-- reviewed:2026-02-23 -->
- Standardized weights, measures, and coinage facilitated trade across the subcontinent
## Decline
@@ -85,4 +85,182 @@ Declined after Ashoka's death due to weak successors and regional fragmentation.
- [x] `@q[stale]` Line 17: "Chandragupta Maurya (~322298 BCE): Founded the empire, defeated Seleucid f..." - Thapar source from 1961 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
> Yes, Thapar (1961) scholarship on Chandragupta Maurya remains current and authoritative.
- [x] `@q[stale]` Line 19: "Ashoka (~268232 BCE): Converted to Buddhism after the Kalinga War, erected..." - Olivelle source from 2023 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
> Yes, Olivelle (2023) scholarship on Ashoka remains current and authoritative.
> Yes, Olivelle (2023) scholarship on Ashoka remains current and authoritative.---
## Review Queue
<!-- factbase:review -->
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 8: "Region: Indian subcontinent, from Afghanistan to Bengal" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Capital: Pataliputra (modern Patna)" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Language: Prakrit, Sanskrit" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Religion: Initially Vedic/Hindu, Buddhism promoted under Ashoka" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 20: "Unified most of the Indian subcontinent for the first time" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 21: "Ashoka's edicts: 33 inscriptions on pillars, boulders, and cave walls — the..." - when was this true? @t[~2026-02-23]
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 22: "*Arthashastra* attributed to Chanakya (also known as Kautilya or Vishnugupta)..." - when was this true? @t[~2026-02-23]
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "Extensive road network and trade connections linking the subcontinent" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 26: "Highly centralized bureaucracy with provincial governors (*kumara*) and an ex..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 27: "Megasthenes, Greek ambassador to Chandragupta's court (~302 BCE), described t..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 28: "Standardized weights, measures, and coinage facilitated trade across the subc..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 41: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Region: Indian subcontinent, from Afghanistan to..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 43: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Period: ~322185 BCE" - when was this true?" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 45: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Capital: Pataliputra (modern Patna)" - when was ..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 47: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 13: "Language: Prakrit, Sanskrit" - when was this true?" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 49: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 14: "Religion: Initially Vedic/Hindu, Buddhism promot..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 51: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "Chandragupta Maurya (~322298 BCE): Founded th..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 53: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Bindusara (~298272 BCE): Expanded southward" ..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 55: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Ashoka (~268232 BCE): Converted to Buddhism a..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 57: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 22: "Unified most of the Indian subcontinent for the ..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 59: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "Ashoka's edicts: Earliest deciphered Indian insc..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 61: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: "*Arthashastra* attributed to Chanakya: Treatise ..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 63: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 25: "Extensive road network and trade connections" - ..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 65: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Region: Indian subcontinent, from Afghanistan to ..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 67: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Period: ~322185 BCE" - what is the source?" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 69: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 12: "Capital: Pataliputra (modern Patna)" - what is th..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 71: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 13: "Language: Prakrit, Sanskrit" - what is the source?" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 73: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 14: "Religion: Initially Vedic/Hindu, Buddhism promote..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 75: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 18: "Bindusara (~298272 BCE): Expanded southward" -..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 77: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 22: "Unified most of the Indian subcontinent for the f..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 79: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "Ashoka's edicts: Earliest deciphered Indian inscr..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 81: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 24: "*Arthashastra* attributed to Chanakya: Treatise o..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 83: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 25: "Extensive road network and trade connections" - w..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 85: "[x] `@q[stale]` Line 17: "Chandragupta Maurya (~322298 BCE): Founded the e..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 87: "[x] `@q[stale]` Line 19: "Ashoka (~268232 BCE): Converted to Buddhism afte..." - when was this true?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 8: "Region: Indian subcontinent, from Afghanistan to Bengal" - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether this claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 9: "Period: ~322185 BCE @t[322 BCE..185 BCE]" - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether this claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Capital: Pataliputra (modern Patna)" - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether this claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Language: Prakrit, Sanskrit" - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether this claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 12: "Religion: Initially Vedic/Hindu, Buddhism promoted under Ashoka" - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether this claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 16: "Bindusara (~298272 BCE): Expanded southward @t[298 BCE..272 BCE]" - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether this claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 20: "Unified most of the Indian subcontinent for the first time" - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether this claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "Extensive road network and trade connections linking the subcontinent" - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether this claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 26: "Highly centralized bureaucracy with provincial governors (*kumara*) and an ex..." - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether this claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 28: "Standardized weights, measures, and coinage facilitated trade across the subc..." - what is the source?
> Need to verify whether this claim has an explicit source citation in the document footnotes.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 41: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Region: Indian subcontinent, from Afghanistan to..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 43: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Period: ~322185 BCE" - when was this true?" - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 45: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Capital: Pataliputra (modern Patna)" - when was ..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 47: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 13: "Language: Prakrit, Sanskrit" - when was this true?" - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 49: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 14: "Religion: Initially Vedic/Hindu, Buddhism promot..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 51: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "Chandragupta Maurya (~322298 BCE): Founded th..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 53: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Bindusara (~298272 BCE): Expanded southward" ..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 55: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Ashoka (~268232 BCE): Converted to Buddhism a..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 57: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 22: "Unified most of the Indian subcontinent for the ..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 59: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "Ashoka's edicts: Earliest deciphered Indian insc..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 61: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: "*Arthashastra* attributed to Chanakya: Treatise ..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 63: "[x] `@q[temporal]` Line 25: "Extensive road network and trade connections" - ..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 65: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Region: Indian subcontinent, from Afghanistan to ..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 67: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Period: ~322185 BCE" - what is the source?" - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 69: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 12: "Capital: Pataliputra (modern Patna)" - what is th..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 71: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 13: "Language: Prakrit, Sanskrit" - what is the source?" - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 73: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 14: "Religion: Initially Vedic/Hindu, Buddhism promote..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 75: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 18: "Bindusara (~298272 BCE): Expanded southward" -..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 77: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 22: "Unified most of the Indian subcontinent for the f..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 79: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "Ashoka's edicts: Earliest deciphered Indian inscr..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 81: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 24: "*Arthashastra* attributed to Chanakya: Treatise o..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 83: "[x] `@q[missing]` Line 25: "Extensive road network and trade connections" - w..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 85: "[x] `@q[stale]` Line 17: "Chandragupta Maurya (~322298 BCE): Founded the e..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 87: "[x] `@q[stale]` Line 19: "Ashoka (~268232 BCE): Converted to Buddhism afte..." - what is the source?
> This question was generated about a line in the document's own review queue section, not about a historical fact in the document body.