Fix deep scan: log output even on failure, capture exit code for debugging

This commit is contained in:
daniel
2026-02-23 12:30:19 +00:00
parent 34d444aa17
commit 517c8f2cd0
71 changed files with 6824 additions and 333 deletions

View File

@@ -28,4 +28,107 @@ Early Christianity emerged in the 1st century CE as a Jewish sect in Roman Judae
---
[^1]: Ehrman, B. *The New Testament: A Historical Introduction* (Oxford, 2016)
[^2]: Brown, P. *The Rise of Western Christendom* (Blackwell, 2003)
[^3]: World History Encyclopedia. "Council of Chalcedon." worldhistory.org (2024)
[^3]: World History Encyclopedia. "Council of Chalcedon." worldhistory.org (2024)
---
## Review Queue
<!-- factbase:review -->
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Key figures: Paul of Tarsus, Peter, James" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 5: Malformed temporal tag @t[=380] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 8: Malformed temporal tag @t[~30] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 9: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-4..~30 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: Malformed temporal tag @t[~50..~120] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: Malformed temporal tag @t[=380] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 15: Malformed temporal tag @t[~46..~60] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 16: Malformed temporal tag @t[=64] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 16: Malformed temporal tag @t[=250] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 16: Malformed temporal tag @t[=303..=311] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: Malformed temporal tag @t[=313] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: Malformed temporal tag @t[=325] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: Malformed temporal tag @t[=380] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 22: Malformed temporal tag @t[=325..=451] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: Malformed temporal tag @t[=451] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: Malformed temporal tag @t[~311..~600] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 25: Malformed temporal tag @t[~300..~400] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 26: Malformed temporal tag @t[~200..~400] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 8: "Origin: Roman Judaea, ~30 CE @t[~30]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 9: "Founder: Jesus of Nazareth (~4 BCE ~30 CE) @t[~4 BCE..~30 CE]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Key figures: Paul of Tarsus, Peter, James" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Sacred texts: New Testament (written ~50120 CE) @t[~50..~120]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 12: "State religion of Rome: 380 CE (Edict of Thessalonica) @t[=380]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 16: "Persecutions under Nero (64 CE) @t[=64], Decius (250 CE) @t[=250], Diocletian..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 17: "Edict of Milan (313 CE): Constantine legalized Christianity @t[=313]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 18: "Council of Nicaea (325 CE): First ecumenical council, established the Nicene ..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 19: "Edict of Thessalonica (380 CE): Christianity became the state religion @t[=380]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 25: "Canon formation: New Testament canon largely settled by ~4th century CE @t[~3..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 15: "Paul's missionary journeys (~4660 CE) spread Christianity across the easte..." - Ehrman source from 2016 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 22: "Christological debates: Nature of Christ debated from Council of Nicaea throu..." - Unknown source from 2024 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 23: "Council of Chalcedon (451 CE): Defined Christ as having two natures (divine a..." - Unknown source from 2024 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 24: "Donatist controversy (4th6th century CE): Schism over whether clergy moral..." - Brown source from 2003 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 26: "Monasticism: Desert Fathers in Egypt (~3rd4th century CE) @t[~200..~400] [^2]" - Brown source from 2003 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>