Fix deep scan: log output even on failure, capture exit code for debugging

This commit is contained in:
daniel
2026-02-23 12:30:19 +00:00
parent 34d444aa17
commit 517c8f2cd0
71 changed files with 6824 additions and 333 deletions

View File

@@ -31,4 +31,83 @@ Bronze working — the alloying of copper with tin — defined the Bronze Age (~
[^3]: Lechtman, H. "Arsenic Bronze: Dirty Copper or Chosen Alloy?" *Journal of Field Archaeology* 23 (1996)
[^4]: Wikiwand, "Lost-wax casting" — oldest known examples ~45504450 BCE, Varna Necropolis, Bulgaria
[^5]: Cline, E.H. *1177 B.C.: The Year Civilization Collapsed* (2014) — Bronze Age Collapse and trade disruption
[^6]: Heritage Daily, "Study reveals arsenical bronze production during Egypt's Middle Kingdom" (2025)
[^6]: Heritage Daily, "Study reveals arsenical bronze production during Egypt's Middle Kingdom" (2025)
---
## Review Queue
<!-- factbase:review -->
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Spread to: Egypt, Indus Valley, China, Europe" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 15: "Arsenical bronze (copper + arsenic) preceded tin-bronze and was used widely i..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 16: "Tin was scarce; long-distance trade networks developed to source it (Cornwall..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Disruption of tin trade routes is considered a contributing factor to the Bro..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[conflict]` Line 8: "Period: ~33001200 BCE (Bronze Age) @t[~3300 BCE..1200 BCE]" @t[-3300..-3300] overlaps with "Composition: ~88% copper, ~12% tin (tin-bronze); earlier arsenical bronze use..." @t[-3300..-3300] - were both true simultaneously? (line:9) [pattern:unknown]
>
- [ ] `@q[conflict]` Line 8: "Period: ~33001200 BCE (Bronze Age) @t[~3300 BCE..1200 BCE]" @t[-3300..-3300] overlaps with "Earliest tin-bronze: Mesopotamia and the Caucasus, ~3300 BCE @t[~3300 BCE]" @t[-3300..-3300] - were both true simultaneously? (line:10) [pattern:unknown]
>
- [ ] `@q[conflict]` Line 9: "Composition: ~88% copper, ~12% tin (tin-bronze); earlier arsenical bronze use..." @t[-3300..-3300] overlaps with "Earliest tin-bronze: Mesopotamia and the Caucasus, ~3300 BCE @t[~3300 BCE]" @t[-3300..-3300] - were both true simultaneously? (line:10) [pattern:unknown]
>
- [ ] `@q[conflict]` Line 22: "Superior weapons: Swords, spearheads, armor @t[~3300 BCE..1200 BCE]" @t[-3300..-3300] overlaps with "Agricultural tools: Plows, sickles @t[~3300 BCE..1200 BCE]" @t[-3300..-3300] - were both true simultaneously? (line:23) [pattern:unknown]
>
- [ ] `@q[conflict]` Line 22: "Superior weapons: Swords, spearheads, armor @t[~3300 BCE..1200 BCE]" @t[-3300..-3300] overlaps with "Monumental art: Statuary, ritual vessels @t[~3300 BCE..1200 BCE]" @t[-3300..-3300] - were both true simultaneously? (line:24) [pattern:unknown]
>
- [ ] `@q[conflict]` Line 22: "Superior weapons: Swords, spearheads, armor @t[~3300 BCE..1200 BCE]" @t[-3300..-3300] overlaps with "Drove long-distance trade networks for tin and copper @t[~3300 BCE..1200 BCE]" @t[-3300..-3300] - were both true simultaneously? (line:25) [pattern:unknown]
>
- [ ] `@q[conflict]` Line 23: "Agricultural tools: Plows, sickles @t[~3300 BCE..1200 BCE]" @t[-3300..-3300] overlaps with "Monumental art: Statuary, ritual vessels @t[~3300 BCE..1200 BCE]" @t[-3300..-3300] - were both true simultaneously? (line:24) [pattern:unknown]
>
- [ ] `@q[conflict]` Line 23: "Agricultural tools: Plows, sickles @t[~3300 BCE..1200 BCE]" @t[-3300..-3300] overlaps with "Drove long-distance trade networks for tin and copper @t[~3300 BCE..1200 BCE]" @t[-3300..-3300] - were both true simultaneously? (line:25) [pattern:unknown]
>
- [ ] `@q[conflict]` Line 24: "Monumental art: Statuary, ritual vessels @t[~3300 BCE..1200 BCE]" @t[-3300..-3300] overlaps with "Drove long-distance trade networks for tin and copper @t[~3300 BCE..1200 BCE]" @t[-3300..-3300] - were both true simultaneously? (line:25) [pattern:unknown]
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 8: "Period: ~33001200 BCE (Bronze Age) @t[~3300 BCE..1200 BCE]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 9: "Composition: ~88% copper, ~12% tin (tin-bronze); earlier arsenical bronze use..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Earliest tin-bronze: Mesopotamia and the Caucasus, ~3300 BCE @t[~3300 BCE]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Spread to: Egypt, Indus Valley, China, Europe" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 14: "Copper smelting preceded bronze by ~2,000 years (Chalcolithic period) @t[~530..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 22: "Superior weapons: Swords, spearheads, armor @t[~3300 BCE..1200 BCE]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "Agricultural tools: Plows, sickles @t[~3300 BCE..1200 BCE]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 24: "Monumental art: Statuary, ritual vessels @t[~3300 BCE..1200 BCE]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 25: "Drove long-distance trade networks for tin and copper @t[~3300 BCE..1200 BCE]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 15: "Arsenical bronze (copper + arsenic) preceded tin-bronze and was used widely i..." - Lechtman source from 1996 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 16: "Tin was scarce; long-distance trade networks developed to source it (Cornwall..." - Muhly source from 1985 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 19: "Disruption of tin trade routes is considered a contributing factor to the Bro..." - Cline source from 1177 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>