Fix deep scan: log output even on failure, capture exit code for debugging

This commit is contained in:
daniel
2026-02-23 12:30:19 +00:00
parent 34d444aa17
commit 517c8f2cd0
71 changed files with 6824 additions and 333 deletions

View File

@@ -33,4 +33,83 @@ Before Baltic amber dominated, Sicilian amber was the primary source for Greece,
---
[^1]: Bouzek, J. "The Amber Route" in *Greece, Anatolia and Europe* (1997)
[^2]: Causey, F. *Amber and the Ancient World* (Getty Museum, 2011)
[^3]: Wikipedia contributors, "Amber Road," *Wikipedia* (accessed 2026-02-23), citing de Navarro (1925), Reeves (1990), Mukherjee et al. (2008), Jovaiša (2001), Schachinger (2020)
[^3]: Wikipedia contributors, "Amber Road," *Wikipedia* (accessed 2026-02-23), citing de Navarro (1925), Reeves (1990), Mukherjee et al. (2008), Jovaiša (2001), Schachinger (2020)
---
## Review Queue
<!-- factbase:review -->
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 9: "Key good: Baltic amber (fossilized tree resin)" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Northern terminus: Baltic coast (modern Poland, Lithuania)" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Southern terminus: Adriatic (Aquileia), Greece, Egypt" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Return goods: Romans exported glass, brass, gold, tin, and copper northward i..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 15: "From the Baltic coast through the Vistula, Dnieper, and Danube river corridor..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 16: "Key waypoints: Biskupin, Wrocław, Carnuntum, Aquileia [^1]" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "In Roman times, the main route ran south from the Baltic coast (modern Lithua..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Connected to Mediterranean trade networks at the Adriatic, and onward to the ..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Roman military fortifications were built along the route to protect merchants..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: "Amber was sent as an offering to the Temple of Apollo at Delphi [^3]" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 26: "The Amber Road likely stimulated the Nordic Bronze Age, bringing Mediterranea..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 28: "Facilitated cultural exchange between northern and southern Europe [^2]" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 5: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-3000..~400 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 8: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-3000..~400 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-1500..~-1200] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 25: Malformed temporal tag @t[~61] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 8: "Period: ~3000 BCE Roman era @t[~3000 BCE..~400 CE]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 9: "Key good: Baltic amber (fossilized tree resin)" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Northern terminus: Baltic coast (modern Poland, Lithuania)" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Southern terminus: Adriatic (Aquileia), Greece, Egypt" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[ambiguous]` Line 18: "Connected to Mediterranean trade networks at the Adriatic, and onward to the ..." - what is the nature of this connection?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 16: "Key waypoints: Biskupin, Wrocław, Carnuntum, Aquileia [^1]" - Bouzek source from 1997 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 18: "Connected to Mediterranean trade networks at the Adriatic, and onward to the ..." - Bouzek source from 1997 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 25: "Romans valued amber highly; Nero sent an expedition to the Baltic to procure ..." - Causey source from 2011 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 28: "Facilitated cultural exchange between northern and southern Europe [^2]" - Causey source from 2011 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>

View File

@@ -43,4 +43,104 @@ The Negev segment of the route — comprising the Nabataean towns of Haluza, Mam
[^2]: Hoyland, R. *Arabia and the Arabs* (Routledge, 2001)
[^3]: UNESCO World Heritage Centre, "Incense Route Desert Cities in the Negev," inscribed 2005. https://whc.unesco.org/en/list/1107
[^4]: Strabo, *Geographica* XVI.4.2224 (primary source for Aelius Gallus expedition and Arabian trade)
[^5]: *Periplus of the Erythraean Sea*, anonymous Greek-Egyptian author, 1st century CE (documents monsoon navigation and Red Sea trade)
[^5]: *Periplus of the Erythraean Sea*, anonymous Greek-Egyptian author, 1st century CE (documents monsoon navigation and Red Sea trade)
---
## Review Queue
<!-- factbase:review -->
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Length: ~2,400 km (main overland route)" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Key goods: Frankincense, myrrh, spices, textiles, Indian luxury goods" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Key peoples: Nabataeans, Sabaeans, Minaeans [^1]" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 15: "Southern terminus: Dhofar (Oman) and Hadhramaut (Yemen)" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 16: "Northern terminus: Gaza, Petra, Damascus" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "Key waypoints: Shabwa, Ma'rib, Petra, Gaza [^1]" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 22: "Kingdom of Saba (Sheba): Controlled production in southern Arabia [^1]" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 35: "Strabo, *Geographica* (1st century BCE/CE): Detailed account of the Aelius Ga..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 36: "*Periplus of the Erythraean Sea* (1st century CE): Eyewitness account of Red ..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 8: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-700..~300 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 9: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-300..~200 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-300..~200 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 21: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-300..106 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-700..~-100] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 27: Malformed temporal tag @t[=106 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 27: Malformed temporal tag @t[~200 CE..~300 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 31: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-100..~100 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 32: Malformed temporal tag @t[=106 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 39: Malformed temporal tag @t[=2005 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 8: "Period: ~7th century BCE ~3rd century CE @t[~700 BCE..~300 CE]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 9: "Peak activity: ~3rd century BCE ~2nd century CE @t[~300 BCE..~200 CE]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Length: ~2,400 km (main overland route)" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Key goods: Frankincense, myrrh, spices, textiles, Indian luxury goods" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 15: "Southern terminus: Dhofar (Oman) and Hadhramaut (Yemen)" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 16: "Northern terminus: Gaza, Petra, Damascus" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 12: "Key peoples: Nabataeans, Sabaeans, Minaeans [^1]" - Avanzini source from 2008 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 17: "Key waypoints: Shabwa, Ma'rib, Petra, Gaza [^1]" - Avanzini source from 2008 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 18: "Negev segment: Four Nabataean towns — Haluza, Mamshit, Avdat, and Shivta ..." - Unknown source from 2005 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 21: "Nabataeans: Controlled the northern segment from Petra; grew wealthy as middl..." - Avanzini source from 2008 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 22: "Kingdom of Saba (Sheba): Controlled production in southern Arabia [^1]" - Avanzini source from 2008 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 23: "Minaeans: Earlier controllers of the southern Arabian trade, predating Nabata..." - Avanzini source from 2008 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 32: "The Roman annexation of Nabataea in 106 CE @t[=106 CE] disrupted the Nabataea..." - Unknown source from 2005 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>

View File

@@ -43,4 +43,122 @@ A complementary sea route — the Maritime Silk Road — connected China's south
[^3]: Wikipedia contributors. "Silk Road." *Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia*. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Silk_Road (accessed 2026)
[^4]: "The 4 Powerful Empires of the Silk Road." *The Collector* (2022). https://www.thecollector.com/four-empires-silk-road/
[^5]: "Sogdian Traders Along the Silk Road." *ResearchGate* (2023). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/371261395
[^6]: Wikipedia contributors. "Maritime Silk Road." *Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia*. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maritime_Silk_Road (accessed 2026)
[^6]: Wikipedia contributors. "Maritime Silk Road." *Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia*. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maritime_Silk_Road (accessed 2026)
---
## Review Queue
<!-- factbase:review -->
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 9: "Length: ~6,400 km (main overland route)" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Key goods: Silk, spices, gold, glass, horses, precious stones" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 14: "Eastern terminus: Chang'an (Xi'an), China" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 15: "Western terminus: Rome, Antioch, Constantinople" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 16: "Key waypoints: Dunhuang, Kashgar, Samarkand, Merv, Ctesiphon, Palmyra" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "Crossed the Taklamakan Desert, Pamir Mountains, and Iranian Plateau [^1]" - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 20: "The **Han dynasty** (China) and **Roman Empire** were the primary producers a..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 27: "Nestorian Christianity, Manichaeism, and Islam traveled eastward in later cen..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 28: "Technologies transferred: Papermaking (China → West), glassmaking (West →..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 29: "Diseases also spread along the routes, possibly including the Antonine Plague..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 38: "Roman demand for Chinese silk was so great that Roman writers complained of g..." - when was this true?
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 8: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-130..~1450 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: Malformed temporal tag @t[=1877 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 21: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-247..224 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 22: Malformed temporal tag @t[~30 CE..375 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: Malformed temporal tag @t[~300 CE..~750 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 26: Malformed temporal tag @t[~1 CE..~400 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 35: Malformed temporal tag @t[-206..220 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 36: Malformed temporal tag @t[~30 CE..375 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 37: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-50..~250 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 8: "Period: ~130 BCE ~1450 CE (ancient period focus: ~130 BCE ~400 CE) @t..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 9: "Length: ~6,400 km (main overland route)" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Named by: Ferdinand von Richthofen (1877) @t[=1877 CE]" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Key goods: Silk, spices, gold, glass, horses, precious stones" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 14: "Eastern terminus: Chang'an (Xi'an), China" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 15: "Western terminus: Rome, Antioch, Constantinople" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 16: "Key waypoints: Dunhuang, Kashgar, Samarkand, Merv, Ctesiphon, Palmyra" - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 27: "Nestorian Christianity, Manichaeism, and Islam traveled eastward in later cen..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 28: "Technologies transferred: Papermaking (China → West), glassmaking (West →..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 36: "**Kushan Empire** (1st3rd century CE): Facilitated trade across Central As..." - what is the source?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 17: "Crossed the Taklamakan Desert, Pamir Mountains, and Iranian Plateau [^1]" - Hansen source from 2012 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 21: "The **Parthian Empire** (~247 BCE 224 CE) controlled the middle section o..." - Unknown source from 2022 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 23: "**Sogdian merchants** from Samarkand dominated commercial activity along the ..." - Unknown source from 2023 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 26: "Buddhism spread from India to China via the Silk Road, carried by monks and m..." - Hansen source from 2012 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 29: "Diseases also spread along the routes, possibly including the Antonine Plague..." - Frankopan source from 2015 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 35: "**Han dynasty** (206 BCE 220 CE): Zhang Qian's first mission to the Weste..." - Hansen source from 2012 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 37: "**Pax Romana / Pax Sinica** (~50 BCE 250 CE): The four empires of Rome, P..." - Unknown source from 2022 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 38: "Roman demand for Chinese silk was so great that Roman writers complained of g..." - Frankopan source from 2015 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
>