Fix deep scan: log output even on failure, capture exit code for debugging
This commit is contained in:
@@ -33,4 +33,83 @@ Before Baltic amber dominated, Sicilian amber was the primary source for Greece,
|
||||
---
|
||||
[^1]: Bouzek, J. "The Amber Route" in *Greece, Anatolia and Europe* (1997)
|
||||
[^2]: Causey, F. *Amber and the Ancient World* (Getty Museum, 2011)
|
||||
[^3]: Wikipedia contributors, "Amber Road," *Wikipedia* (accessed 2026-02-23), citing de Navarro (1925), Reeves (1990), Mukherjee et al. (2008), Jovaiša (2001), Schachinger (2020)
|
||||
[^3]: Wikipedia contributors, "Amber Road," *Wikipedia* (accessed 2026-02-23), citing de Navarro (1925), Reeves (1990), Mukherjee et al. (2008), Jovaiša (2001), Schachinger (2020)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Queue
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- factbase:review -->
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 9: "Key good: Baltic amber (fossilized tree resin)" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Northern terminus: Baltic coast (modern Poland, Lithuania)" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Southern terminus: Adriatic (Aquileia), Greece, Egypt" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Return goods: Romans exported glass, brass, gold, tin, and copper northward i..." - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 15: "From the Baltic coast through the Vistula, Dnieper, and Danube river corridor..." - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 16: "Key waypoints: Biskupin, Wrocław, Carnuntum, Aquileia [^1]" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "In Roman times, the main route ran south from the Baltic coast (modern Lithua..." - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Connected to Mediterranean trade networks at the Adriatic, and onward to the ..." - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Roman military fortifications were built along the route to protect merchants..." - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: "Amber was sent as an offering to the Temple of Apollo at Delphi [^3]" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 26: "The Amber Road likely stimulated the Nordic Bronze Age, bringing Mediterranea..." - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 28: "Facilitated cultural exchange between northern and southern Europe [^2]" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 5: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-3000..~400 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 8: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-3000..~400 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-1500..~-1200] — see docs for valid syntax
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 25: Malformed temporal tag @t[~61] — see docs for valid syntax
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 8: "Period: ~3000 BCE – Roman era @t[~3000 BCE..~400 CE]" - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 9: "Key good: Baltic amber (fossilized tree resin)" - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Northern terminus: Baltic coast (modern Poland, Lithuania)" - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Southern terminus: Adriatic (Aquileia), Greece, Egypt" - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[ambiguous]` Line 18: "Connected to Mediterranean trade networks at the Adriatic, and onward to the ..." - what is the nature of this connection?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 16: "Key waypoints: Biskupin, Wrocław, Carnuntum, Aquileia [^1]" - Bouzek source from 1997 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 18: "Connected to Mediterranean trade networks at the Adriatic, and onward to the ..." - Bouzek source from 1997 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 25: "Romans valued amber highly; Nero sent an expedition to the Baltic to procure ..." - Causey source from 2011 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 28: "Facilitated cultural exchange between northern and southern Europe [^2]" - Causey source from 2011 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user