Fix deep scan: log output even on failure, capture exit code for debugging
This commit is contained in:
daniel
@@ -27,4 +27,83 @@ Cuneiform is the earliest known writing system, developed in Sumer ~3400 BCE. Wr
|
||||
---
|
||||
[^1]: Walker, C.B.F. *Cuneiform* (British Museum, 1987)
|
||||
[^2]: Robson, E. *Mathematics in Ancient Iraq* (Princeton, 2008)
|
||||
[^3]: Mark, J.J. "Cuneiform." *World History Encyclopedia*, 2011. https://www.worldhistory.org/cuneiform/
|
||||
[^3]: Mark, J.J. "Cuneiform." *World History Encyclopedia*, 2011. https://www.worldhistory.org/cuneiform/
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Queue
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- factbase:review -->
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 9: "Medium: Clay tablets impressed with a wedge-shaped reed stylus" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Name: From Latin *cuneus* ("wedge")" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Languages written: Sumerian, Akkadian, Eblaite, Elamite, Hittite, Hurrian, Lu..." - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Influenced: Ugaritic and Old Persian alphabets derived from the cuneiform tra..." - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "~600–1,000 signs in use at various periods" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: "Preserved the *Epic of Gilgamesh*, Code of Hammurabi, and thousands of admini..." - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 25: "~500,000 cuneiform tablets have been excavated; many remain untranslated [^3]" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 5: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-3400..=75 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 13: Malformed temporal tag @t[~1802 CE..~1857 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 16: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-3400..~-3000] — see docs for valid syntax
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 20: Malformed temporal tag @t[=75 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-3400..=75 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 8: "Origin: Sumer, southern Mesopotamia, ~3400 BCE @t[~3400 BCE]" - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 9: "Medium: Clay tablets impressed with a wedge-shaped reed stylus" - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Name: From Latin *cuneus* ("wedge")" - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 17: "Evolved into syllabic writing by ~2600 BCE @t[~2600 BCE]" - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 19: "~600–1,000 signs in use at various periods" - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "Enabled record-keeping, literature, law, science, and diplomacy @t[~3400 BCE...." - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 24: "Preserved the *Epic of Gilgamesh*, Code of Hammurabi, and thousands of admini..." - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 11: "Languages written: Sumerian, Akkadian, Eblaite, Elamite, Hittite, Hurrian, Lu..." - Walker source from 1987 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 12: "Influenced: Ugaritic and Old Persian alphabets derived from the cuneiform tra..." - Mark source from 2011 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 13: "Deciphered by: Georg Friedrich Grotefend (1802), Henry Rawlinson, Edward Hinc..." - Walker source from 1987 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 16: "Proto-cuneiform: pictographic/logographic system for accounting (~3400–3000..." - Mark source from 2011 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 20: "Last known cuneiform tablet: 75 CE (astronomical text from Babylon) @t[=75 CE..." - Robson source from 2008 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 25: "~500,000 cuneiform tablets have been excavated; many remain untranslated [^3]" - Mark source from 2011 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -26,4 +26,20 @@ Egyptian hieroglyphics were the formal writing system of ancient Egypt, used for
|
||||
[^1]: Robinson, A. *Cracking the Egyptian Code* (Thames & Hudson, 2012)
|
||||
[^2]: Parkinson, R. *The Rosetta Stone* (British Museum, 2005)
|
||||
[^3]: World History Encyclopedia. "Egyptian Hieroglyphs." worldhistory.org (2025)
|
||||
[^4]: Wikipedia. "Book of the Dead." en.wikipedia.org (accessed 2026)
|
||||
[^4]: Wikipedia. "Book of the Dead." en.wikipedia.org (accessed 2026)
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Queue
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- factbase:review -->
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Coptic: Final stage of the Egyptian language, using Greek alphabet with Demot..." - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 9: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-3200..~400 CE] — see docs for valid syntax
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: Malformed temporal tag @t[~-1550..~-50] — see docs for valid syntax
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[missing]` Line 18: "Coptic: Final stage of the Egyptian language, using Greek alphabet with Demot..." - what is the source?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -36,4 +36,74 @@ The 22 letters were named acrophonically — each letter name began with the sou
|
||||
[^2]: Daniels, P.T. & Bright, W. *The World's Writing Systems* (Oxford, 1996)
|
||||
[^3]: Wikipedia contributors. "Phoenician language." *Wikipedia*. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phoenician_language
|
||||
[^4]: History of Information. "The Oldest Known Evidence of the Phoenician Alphabet." http://www.historyofinformation.com/detail.php?id=1310
|
||||
[^5]: Encyclopaedia Britannica. "Phoenician alphabet." https://www.britannica.com/topic/Phoenician-alphabet
|
||||
[^5]: Encyclopaedia Britannica. "Phoenician alphabet." https://www.britannica.com/topic/Phoenician-alphabet
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Review Queue
|
||||
|
||||
<!-- factbase:review -->
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 9: "Type: Abjad (consonantal alphabet, no vowels) [^2]" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Number of letters: 22 [^1]" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Direction: Right to left [^1]" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 13: "Used for: Iron Age Canaanite languages — Phoenician, Hebrew, Ammonite, Edom..." - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "Aramaic alphabet: Ancestor of Hebrew, Arabic, Syriac, and many Asian scripts ..." - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: "Latin alphabet (via Greek and Etruscan): Used by most of the modern world [^2]" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 26: "South Arabian script: Ancestor of Ethiopic (Ge'ez) [^2]" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 29: "Simplified writing from hundreds of signs (cuneiform, hieroglyphics) to 22 le..." - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 30: "Made literacy more accessible beyond scribal elites [^2]" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 31: "Spread across the Mediterranean through Phoenician trade networks; Tyro-Sidon..." - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[temporal]` Line 32: "Encoded in Unicode block U+10900–U+1091F [^5]" - when was this true?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 8: "Origin: Phoenicia (modern Lebanon), ~1050 BCE @t[~1050 BCE] [^1]" - Sass source from 1988 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 9: "Type: Abjad (consonantal alphabet, no vowels) [^2]" - Daniels source from 1996 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 10: "Number of letters: 22 [^1]" - Sass source from 1988 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 11: "Direction: Right to left [^1]" - Sass source from 1988 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 12: "Derived from: Proto-Sinaitic/Proto-Canaanite script (~1800 BCE) @t[~1800 BCE]..." - Sass source from 1988 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 22: "Greek alphabet (~800 BCE): Added vowels, adapted letter forms @t[~800 BCE] [^1]" - Sass source from 1988 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 23: "Aramaic alphabet: Ancestor of Hebrew, Arabic, Syriac, and many Asian scripts ..." - Daniels source from 1996 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 24: "Latin alphabet (via Greek and Etruscan): Used by most of the modern world [^2]" - Daniels source from 1996 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 26: "South Arabian script: Ancestor of Ethiopic (Ge'ez) [^2]" - Daniels source from 1996 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 29: "Simplified writing from hundreds of signs (cuneiform, hieroglyphics) to 22 le..." - Daniels source from 1996 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] `@q[stale]` Line 30: "Made literacy more accessible beyond scribal elites [^2]" - Daniels source from 1996 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||||
>
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user