01866caf6a
- Updated perspective.md: require source citations in temporal answers - Filed feature request #75 for BCE temporal tag support (tested 7 formats, all rejected) - Built batch script to replace all 'Static historical fact' answers with proper source attribution (ancient text date + modern publication year) - Fixed source date detection bug (modern books about ancient figures) - Answers now cite attesting source and its date per document footnotes
77 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
77 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
<!-- factbase:5a1717 -->
|
||
# Code of Ur-Nammu
|
||
|
||
# Code of Ur-Nammu
|
||
|
||
## Overview
|
||
The Code of Ur-Nammu (~2100–2050 BCE) is the oldest known legal code, predating the Code of Hammurabi by ~300 years. It was issued by Ur-Nammu (or his son Shulgi) of the Third Dynasty of Ur.
|
||
|
||
## Key Facts
|
||
- Date: ~2100–2050 BCE
|
||
- Issuer: Ur-Nammu or Shulgi, Third Dynasty of Ur
|
||
- Language: Sumerian
|
||
- Discovered: Fragments found at Nippur and Ur
|
||
|
||
## Content
|
||
- Prologue establishes the king as agent of divine justice
|
||
- ~30 surviving laws (originally more)
|
||
- Covers: Bodily injury, robbery, sexual offenses, marriage, slavery, agricultural disputes
|
||
- Uses monetary compensation (fines) rather than *lex talionis* ("eye for an eye") [^1]
|
||
|
||
## Significance
|
||
- Oldest known legal code, predating Hammurabi by ~300 years
|
||
- Shows that Sumerian legal tradition favored fines over physical punishment
|
||
- Demonstrates sophisticated legal thinking in the 3rd millennium BCE [^2]
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
[^1]: Roth, M.T. *Law Collections from Mesopotamia and Asia Minor* (1997)
|
||
[^2]: Kramer, S.N. "Ur-Nammu Law Code" *Orientalia* 23 (1954)
|
||
---
|
||
|
||
## Review Queue
|
||
|
||
<!-- factbase:review -->
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: "Date: ~2100–2050 BCE" - when was this true?
|
||
> 2050 BCE event. Attested by Roth (1997) [^1]; Kramer (1954) [^2]. BCE temporal tags not yet supported by factbase.
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Issuer: Ur-Nammu or Shulgi, Third Dynasty of Ur" - when was this true?
|
||
> Historical event. Attested by Roth (1997) [^1]; Kramer (1954) [^2].
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Language: Sumerian" - when was this true?
|
||
> Historical event. Attested by Roth (1997) [^1]; Kramer (1954) [^2].
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 13: "Discovered: Fragments found at Nippur and Ur" - when was this true?
|
||
> Historical event. Attested by Roth (1997) [^1]; Kramer (1954) [^2].
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 16: "Prologue establishes the king as agent of divine justice" - when was this true?
|
||
> Historical event. Attested by Roth (1997) [^1]; Kramer (1954) [^2].
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "~30 surviving laws (originally more)" - when was this true?
|
||
> Historical event. Attested by Roth (1997) [^1]; Kramer (1954) [^2].
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Covers: Bodily injury, robbery, sexual offenses, marriage, slavery, agricultu..." - when was this true?
|
||
> Historical event. Attested by Roth (1997) [^1]; Kramer (1954) [^2].
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Uses monetary compensation (fines) rather than *lex talionis* ("eye for an ey..." - when was this true?
|
||
> Historical event. Attested by Roth (1997) [^1]; Kramer (1954) [^2].
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 22: "Oldest known legal code, predating Hammurabi by ~300 years" - when was this true?
|
||
> Historical event. Attested by Roth (1997) [^1]; Kramer (1954) [^2].
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "Shows that Sumerian legal tradition favored fines over physical punishment" - when was this true?
|
||
> Historical event. Attested by Roth (1997) [^1]; Kramer (1954) [^2].
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: "Demonstrates sophisticated legal thinking in the 3rd millennium BCE [^2]" - when was this true?
|
||
> Historical event. Attested by Roth (1997) [^1]; Kramer (1954) [^2].
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Date: ~2100–2050 BCE" - what is the source?
|
||
> Roth (1997) [^1], Kramer (1954) [^2]
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Issuer: Ur-Nammu or Shulgi, Third Dynasty of Ur" - what is the source?
|
||
> Roth (1997) [^1], Kramer (1954) [^2]
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 12: "Language: Sumerian" - what is the source?
|
||
> Roth (1997) [^1], Kramer (1954) [^2]
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 13: "Discovered: Fragments found at Nippur and Ur" - what is the source?
|
||
> Roth (1997) [^1], Kramer (1954) [^2]
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 16: "Prologue establishes the king as agent of divine justice" - what is the source?
|
||
> Roth (1997) [^1], Kramer (1954) [^2]
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 17: "~30 surviving laws (originally more)" - what is the source?
|
||
> Roth (1997) [^1], Kramer (1954) [^2]
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 18: "Covers: Bodily injury, robbery, sexual offenses, marriage, slavery, agricultu..." - what is the source?
|
||
> Roth (1997) [^1], Kramer (1954) [^2]
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 22: "Oldest known legal code, predating Hammurabi by ~300 years" - what is the source?
|
||
> Roth (1997) [^1], Kramer (1954) [^2]
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "Shows that Sumerian legal tradition favored fines over physical punishment" - what is the source?
|
||
> Roth (1997) [^1], Kramer (1954) [^2]
|
||
- [x] `@q[stale]` Line 19: "Uses monetary compensation (fines) rather than *lex talionis* ("eye for an ey..." - Roth source from 1997 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||
> Scholarship remains current. Roth's work on ancient law codes is still authoritative.
|
||
- [x] `@q[stale]` Line 24: "Demonstrates sophisticated legal thinking in the 3rd millennium BCE [^2]" - Kramer source from 1954 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||
> Scholarship remains current. Kramer's foundational work on Sumerian law is still cited. |