83 lines
6.0 KiB
Markdown
83 lines
6.0 KiB
Markdown
<!-- factbase:fc7830 -->
|
||
# Battle of Adrianople
|
||
|
||
# Battle of Adrianople
|
||
|
||
## Overview
|
||
The Battle of Adrianople (378 CE) was a catastrophic Roman defeat in which the Visigoths destroyed a Roman army and killed Emperor Valens. It is often cited as a turning point signaling the decline of Roman military power. @t[=0378]
|
||
|
||
## Key Facts
|
||
- Date: 9 August 378 CE @t[=0378]
|
||
- Location: Adrianople (modern Edirne, Turkey)
|
||
- Belligerents: Eastern Roman Empire vs. Visigoths
|
||
- Commanders: Emperor Valens (Rome, killed), Fritigern (Visigoths)
|
||
- Result: Decisive Visigothic victory [^1]
|
||
|
||
## The Battle
|
||
- Valens attacked without waiting for Western reinforcements under Gratian
|
||
- Roman cavalry was routed by a surprise Gothic cavalry charge
|
||
- Roman infantry was surrounded and annihilated
|
||
- ~20,000 Roman soldiers killed, including Valens himself
|
||
|
||
## Significance
|
||
- Demonstrated the vulnerability of Roman legions to heavy cavalry
|
||
- Led to the Treaty of 382 CE: Visigoths settled within the empire as *foederati* @t[=0382]
|
||
- Often considered a harbinger of the fall of the Western Roman Empire [^2]
|
||
|
||
---
|
||
[^1]: Ammianus Marcellinus, *Res Gestae* 31.12–13
|
||
[^2]: Burns, T.S. *Barbarians Within the Gates of Rome* (1994)---
|
||
|
||
## Review Queue
|
||
|
||
<!-- factbase:review -->
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Date: 9 August 378 CE @t[=0378]" - what is the source?
|
||
> Well-established historical date from Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae (Book 31), the primary contemporary source for the battle. Also corroborated by later sources including Orosius and Zosimus.
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Location: Adrianople (modern Edirne, Turkey)" - when was this true?
|
||
> Static historical fact. Battle occurred 9 August 378 CE. No temporal tag needed.
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Belligerents: Eastern Roman Empire vs. Visigoths" - when was this true?
|
||
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 13: "Commanders: Emperor Valens (Rome, killed), Fritigern (Visigoths)" - when was this true?
|
||
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 14: "Result: Decisive Visigothic victory [^1]" - when was this true?
|
||
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "Valens attacked without waiting for Western reinforcements under Gratian" - when was this true?
|
||
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Roman cavalry was routed by a surprise Gothic cavalry charge" - when was this true?
|
||
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Roman infantry was surrounded and annihilated" - when was this true?
|
||
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 20: "~20,000 Roman soldiers killed, including Valens himself" - when was this true?
|
||
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "Demonstrated the vulnerability of Roman legions to heavy cavalry" - when was this true?
|
||
> Static historical fact / scholarly interpretation. No temporal tag needed.
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 25: "Often considered a harbinger of the fall of the Western Roman Empire [^2]" - when was this true?
|
||
> Static historical interpretation. No temporal tag needed.
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 7: Malformed temporal tag @t[=378] — see docs for valid syntax
|
||
> Fix to @t[=0378]. The temporal tag system requires 4-digit years.
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: Malformed temporal tag @t[=378] — see docs for valid syntax
|
||
> Fix to @t[=0378]. The temporal tag system requires 4-digit years.
|
||
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: Malformed temporal tag @t[=382] — see docs for valid syntax
|
||
> Fix to @t[=0382]. The temporal tag system requires 4-digit years.
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Date: 9 August 378 CE @t[=378]" - what is the source?
|
||
> Source: Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 31.12-13 [^1]. The primary eyewitness account.
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Location: Adrianople (modern Edirne, Turkey)" - what is the source?
|
||
> Source: Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 31.12 [^1]. Well-established location.
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 12: "Belligerents: Eastern Roman Empire vs. Visigoths" - what is the source?
|
||
> Source: Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 31.12 [^1].
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 13: "Commanders: Emperor Valens (Rome, killed), Fritigern (Visigoths)" - what is the source?
|
||
> Source: Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 31.12-13 [^1].
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 17: "Valens attacked without waiting for Western reinforcements under Gratian" - what is the source?
|
||
> Source: Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 31.12.4-6 [^1].
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 18: "Roman cavalry was routed by a surprise Gothic cavalry charge" - what is the source?
|
||
> Source: Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 31.13.2 [^1].
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 19: "Roman infantry was surrounded and annihilated" - what is the source?
|
||
> Source: Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 31.13.6-8 [^1].
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 20: "~20,000 Roman soldiers killed, including Valens himself" - what is the source?
|
||
> Source: Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 31.13.18 [^1]. Casualty figure is a modern estimate; Ammianus says two-thirds of the army was lost.
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "Demonstrated the vulnerability of Roman legions to heavy cavalry" - what is the source?
|
||
> Source: Burns (1994) [^2]; also Delbrück, History of the Art of War. This is a longstanding scholarly interpretation, though some modern historians debate the cavalry emphasis.
|
||
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 24: "Led to the Treaty of 382 CE: Visigoths settled within the empire as *foederat..." - what is the source?
|
||
> Source: Burns (1994) [^2]; Heather, P. The Fall of the Roman Empire (2006). The treaty of 382 CE is well-attested in Themistius, Orations.
|
||
- [x] `@q[stale]` Line 25: "Often considered a harbinger of the fall of the Western Roman Empire [^2]" - Burns source from 1994 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
|
||
> Burns (1994) remains a standard reference. The interpretation of Adrianople as a turning point is longstanding scholarly consensus, also supported by Heather (2006) and Lenski (2002). Still accurate. |