Files
factbase-ancient-history/battles/battle-of-adrianople.md

83 lines
6.0 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
<!-- factbase:fc7830 -->
# Battle of Adrianople
# Battle of Adrianople
## Overview
The Battle of Adrianople (378 CE) was a catastrophic Roman defeat in which the Visigoths destroyed a Roman army and killed Emperor Valens. It is often cited as a turning point signaling the decline of Roman military power. @t[=0378]
## Key Facts
- Date: 9 August 378 CE @t[=0378]
- Location: Adrianople (modern Edirne, Turkey)
- Belligerents: Eastern Roman Empire vs. Visigoths
- Commanders: Emperor Valens (Rome, killed), Fritigern (Visigoths)
- Result: Decisive Visigothic victory [^1]
## The Battle
- Valens attacked without waiting for Western reinforcements under Gratian
- Roman cavalry was routed by a surprise Gothic cavalry charge
- Roman infantry was surrounded and annihilated
- ~20,000 Roman soldiers killed, including Valens himself
## Significance
- Demonstrated the vulnerability of Roman legions to heavy cavalry
- Led to the Treaty of 382 CE: Visigoths settled within the empire as *foederati* @t[=0382]
- Often considered a harbinger of the fall of the Western Roman Empire [^2]
---
[^1]: Ammianus Marcellinus, *Res Gestae* 31.1213
[^2]: Burns, T.S. *Barbarians Within the Gates of Rome* (1994)---
## Review Queue
<!-- factbase:review -->
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Date: 9 August 378 CE @t[=0378]" - what is the source?
> Well-established historical date from Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae (Book 31), the primary contemporary source for the battle. Also corroborated by later sources including Orosius and Zosimus.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 11: "Location: Adrianople (modern Edirne, Turkey)" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. Battle occurred 9 August 378 CE. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 12: "Belligerents: Eastern Roman Empire vs. Visigoths" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 13: "Commanders: Emperor Valens (Rome, killed), Fritigern (Visigoths)" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 14: "Result: Decisive Visigothic victory [^1]" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 17: "Valens attacked without waiting for Western reinforcements under Gratian" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 18: "Roman cavalry was routed by a surprise Gothic cavalry charge" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 19: "Roman infantry was surrounded and annihilated" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 20: "~20,000 Roman soldiers killed, including Valens himself" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 23: "Demonstrated the vulnerability of Roman legions to heavy cavalry" - when was this true?
> Static historical fact / scholarly interpretation. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 25: "Often considered a harbinger of the fall of the Western Roman Empire [^2]" - when was this true?
> Static historical interpretation. No temporal tag needed.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 7: Malformed temporal tag @t[=378] — see docs for valid syntax
> Fix to @t[=0378]. The temporal tag system requires 4-digit years.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 10: Malformed temporal tag @t[=378] — see docs for valid syntax
> Fix to @t[=0378]. The temporal tag system requires 4-digit years.
- [x] `@q[temporal]` Line 24: Malformed temporal tag @t[=382] — see docs for valid syntax
> Fix to @t[=0382]. The temporal tag system requires 4-digit years.
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 10: "Date: 9 August 378 CE @t[=378]" - what is the source?
> Source: Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 31.12-13 [^1]. The primary eyewitness account.
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 11: "Location: Adrianople (modern Edirne, Turkey)" - what is the source?
> Source: Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 31.12 [^1]. Well-established location.
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 12: "Belligerents: Eastern Roman Empire vs. Visigoths" - what is the source?
> Source: Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 31.12 [^1].
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 13: "Commanders: Emperor Valens (Rome, killed), Fritigern (Visigoths)" - what is the source?
> Source: Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 31.12-13 [^1].
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 17: "Valens attacked without waiting for Western reinforcements under Gratian" - what is the source?
> Source: Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 31.12.4-6 [^1].
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 18: "Roman cavalry was routed by a surprise Gothic cavalry charge" - what is the source?
> Source: Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 31.13.2 [^1].
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 19: "Roman infantry was surrounded and annihilated" - what is the source?
> Source: Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 31.13.6-8 [^1].
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 20: "~20,000 Roman soldiers killed, including Valens himself" - what is the source?
> Source: Ammianus Marcellinus, Res Gestae 31.13.18 [^1]. Casualty figure is a modern estimate; Ammianus says two-thirds of the army was lost.
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 23: "Demonstrated the vulnerability of Roman legions to heavy cavalry" - what is the source?
> Source: Burns (1994) [^2]; also Delbrück, History of the Art of War. This is a longstanding scholarly interpretation, though some modern historians debate the cavalry emphasis.
- [x] `@q[missing]` Line 24: "Led to the Treaty of 382 CE: Visigoths settled within the empire as *foederat..." - what is the source?
> Source: Burns (1994) [^2]; Heather, P. The Fall of the Roman Empire (2006). The treaty of 382 CE is well-attested in Themistius, Orations.
- [x] `@q[stale]` Line 25: "Often considered a harbinger of the fall of the Western Roman Empire [^2]" - Burns source from 1994 may be outdated, is this still accurate?
> Burns (1994) remains a standard reference. The interpretation of Adrianople as a turning point is longstanding scholarly consensus, also supported by Heather (2006) and Lenski (2002). Still accurate.